[NSRCA-discussion] Executive Board voting

Mon Nov 19 19:21:01 AKST 2012

The nov 8 minutes say they need to be put up for voting as soon as possible, they've been on the site for quite sometime. 

Sent from my iPhone5

On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:14 PM, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:

> The NSRCA bylaws state, in part:
>  
> "a. Candidates for office will be researched and proposed by a Chairperson and/or committee selected by the President of the NSRCA. This Chairperson or Committee will be comprised of a member or members of the NSRCA who are not currently serving as elected or selected board members of the NSRCA."
>  
> Who was the chairperson/committee, not comprised of board members that Jim selected? I can't find anything on this.
>  
> Neither the September, nor the November Board meeting minutes make mention of the bylaw change allowing online voting having been voted on.  In the September K-Factor, Jim makes brief mention of voting on the changes online. Did this take place?  If so, when did voting open and when did it close?  How many people voted and what were the results?  When will the complete new bylaws be published, in full, as required by Section X?
>  
> I guess from what Scott wrote, I now have to look at the website, this list, Facebook, and the K-Factor every day because I might miss something.  I also notice that the Nov 8th minutes say that nominations need to be put on the website as soon as possible, so I guess they weren't up before then. 
> Jon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Atwood, Mark <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 9:29 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Executive Board voting
> 
> Jon makes a good point though that not everyone in the NSRCA has gone completely 
> Digital.  Like him, I've yet to see an October K-Factor, much less a November 
> one.  I'm online for work all day, (as I am now) so the last thing I want is to 
> read an online mag.
> 
> Not throwing stones, since I'm painfully familiar with the role of a volunteer.  
> But in the future we need to get the word out to ALL NSRCA members.  Not just 
> those with an online presence.  At least not until we make that a requirement 
> for membership.
> 
> So what is the scoop on the K-Factors??
> 
> 
> Mark Atwood
> Paragon Consulting, Inc.  |  President
> 5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
> Phone: 440.684.3101 x102  |  Fax: 440.684.3102
> mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com<mailto:mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com>  |  
> www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 10:18 PM, Scott McHarg wrote:
> 
> 
> Requests for nominations were posted on the home page of the NSRCA website for 
> over one month. Board minutes from September 27 listed the nominations.  The 
> Facebook page also reminded participants about turning in nominations.  I am 
> uncertain about the list but I will also check to see if something was sent out 
> to the list.  If we missed this list, it was a mistake by the board.  I think I 
> speak for every single individual that volunteers to fill these 
> positions....there is nothing more that we'd rather see than more participation 
> in helping, volunteering and contributing to our organization.  Many times, 
> these positions are filled because no one else wants to.
> 
> 
> Scott
> 
> On Nov 19, 2012 8:59 PM, "Jon Lowe" <jonlowe at aol.com<mailto:jonlowe at aol.com>> 
> wrote:
> I'm a little concerned about the nomination process this year.  I didn't 
> remember seeing an announcement on this list that nominations were being 
> solicited, so I did a search in the list archives.  Didn't find anything.  Then 
> I looked at the online K-Factors.  Hmmm, a brief mention in Jim Quinn's column 
> in the October issue (which I still haven't received in the mail), and nothing 
> in the November issue that I could find (I haven't received that one either).  I 
> haven't found anything else.
> 
> I did find a lot of griping by the current NSRCA board members in the online 
> November K-Factor about an alleged lack of transparency in the Contest Board 
> procedures for the proposed rules changes that were all voted down.  I guess I 
> see a lack of tranparency here for the NSRCA board nominations.  The first I 
> knew that anyone had been nominated was today when I received the email here 
> asking us to vote.  In years past, we gave the nominees an opportunity to 
> provide their thoughts on why they should be elected.  Whatever happened to 
> that?
> 
> Did I miss something?
> 
> Oh, and about the Contest Board.  Their process is well documented by the AMA 
> and follows a strict time table.  We all had the opportunity to provide inputs 
> and cross proposals after the initial vote.  We also had the opportunity to talk 
> to the CB members, and I did talk to a couple of them.  The CB members are 
> mostly active members of the pattern community, are well known, and are charted 
> by the AMA, not the NSRCA, to look at rules proposals to benefit all AMA 
> participants, not just NSRCA members. Problems with the NSRCA proposals were 
> hashed out here, and the submitters had the opportunity to fix issues during the 
> cross proposal process.  How much follow-up contact did the NSRCA board initiate 
> with the CB during the process?  Were any cross proposals submitted?
> 
> Flame suit on...
> Jon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com<mailto:vogel.peter at gmail.com>>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
> Sent: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 7:55 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Executive Board voting
> 
> I confess I don't understand why folks would vote for someone who didn't want to 
> be bothered to put their name in the very small hat...  I'd rather vote for 
> someone committed to doing a good job in the position...
> 
> For me that means Jon Carter, the fact that I know him and know his level of 
> commitment to the sport and the quality of his thinking, not to mention his 
> coaching helps, but I don't think it would matter if he were on the east coast 
> and I were here in CA, because he stepped up as the sole volunteer for a 
> difficult position amongst some of the most compulsive-obsessive freaks (I count 
> myself in that description) in RC...
> 
> Peter+
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com<mailto:scmcharg at gmail.com>> 
> wrote:
> If a guy who wins the popular vote that is a write-in and that person accepts 
> the nomination, I would assume that person wins and takes the office.  If the 
> write-in declines, it would defer to the person with the next largest amount of 
> votes.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com<mailto:vanputter at gmail.com>> 
> wrote:
> So if a guy whose name is not an "accepted nominee" wins, we start voting for 
> that office over?  Or does the election process defer to an "accepted nominee"?
> 
> Ron
> 
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Jon Lowe wrote:
> 
> Because someone wrote them in.  I like the choice.
> Jon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com<mailto:vanputter at gmail.com>>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
> Sent: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 6:52 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Executive Board voting
> 
> If some are not "accepted nominations", why are their names on the ballot?
> 
> Ron
> 
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 6:44 PM, Scott McHarg wrote:
> 
> Good evening guys,
>    During the voting process, there have been a few write-in votes.  This is 
> GREAT!  Please, keep in mind, however, that write-in votes are not truly 
> accepted nominations.  Some of the write-in votes are for people that have 
> already voted for others.  In other words, they probably don't even know they 
> have been nominated.  There is absolutely nothing wrong voting for write-in 
> candidates but you may want to make sure they know they have been nominated.  We 
> are trying to keep up with the voting to place "Write-In candidate" next to 
> those names.  Due to a restriction in the software, write-in candidates will 
> display in the choices.  The following are accepted nominations by the nominees.  
> All others are write-ins.
> 
> President - Jon Carter
> VP - Don Atwood
> Secretary - Scott McHarg
> Treasurer - John Gayer
> 
> Warmest Regards and Happy Thanksgiving,
> Scott
> 
> --
> Scott A. McHarg
> Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Scott A. McHarg
> Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
> [http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6513778381_5569cc985d_m.jpg]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20121120/111b2f33/attachment.html>