[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

[Daniel McLalin]

>
> John,
>

I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140 and it
occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight limit should be
considered.  This does not mean I agree, but just for thought.

> , electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks are heavy but
> their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't competitive any more we
> ought to have a high minimum weight for 4-strokes and electrics to level the
> playing field; and I want a weight break because I added 4 oz when I put
> ignition on my YS's.
>
> Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules.
>
> Jon Lowe
>
>
>   -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com>
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
> Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become viable for
> pattern?
> --
> Regards,
> Daniel McLalin
> ____________________
> Of all the things I ever lost....................................... I miss
> my mind the most!
>
> www.firehow.com
> www.premierbowlers.com
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>



-- 
Regards,
Daniel McLalin
____________________
Of all the things I ever lost....................................... I miss
my mind the most!

www.firehow.com
www.premierbowlers.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100102/ff47c0bf/attachment.html>