[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

[Phil Spelt]

You got that right, Jon!!!  Also true in SPA...

At 08:17 PM 1/1/2010, you wrote:
>Here we go again...
>
>Let's see, electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks 
>are heavy but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't 
>competitive any more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 
>4-strokes and electrics to level the playing field; and I want a 
>weight break because I added 4 oz when I put ignition on my YS's.
>
>Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules.
>
>Jon Lowe
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com>
>To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm
>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
>Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become viable 
>for pattern?
>--
>Regards,
>Daniel McLalin
>____________________
>Of all the things I ever lost....................................... 
>I miss my mind the most!
>
><http://www.firehow.com>www.firehow.com
>www.premierbowlers.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
><mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-->There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.

Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
        URL: http://www.kcrctn.com
AMA--1294,  Scientific Leader Member, SPA--177
       My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
       (865) 435-1476 v  (865) 604-0541 c  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100102/a607f9a7/attachment.html>