[NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
rcmaster199 at aol.com
rcmaster199 at aol.com
Wed Sep 23 17:11:17 AKDT 2009
Don,
That's totally expected. I know that Dean has recommended to the schedules committee to start to incorporate the vertical complex maneuvers but to apparently deaf ears.
The powers that be don't want them at least not now..
I agree with you that here, real estate is harder to come by, particularly in the northeast
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Ramsey <don.ramsey at suddenlink.net>
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 2:19 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
Matt,
?
You will be disappointed to know that all the World Judges want to have rolling circles.? I objected strongly and thought I made a good argument; loss of fields, over houses, too much real estate, etc.? But, they still want the rolling circles in all future patterns and especially F patterns.? It sure limits the number of fields that can fly those patterns unless the pilots decide to roll in.
?
Don
?
?
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 11:32 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
?
It seems to me that we keep "learning" the same lessons but some just never get the memo. Rolling circles are very neat differentiating maneuvers BUT not desirable in neither IMAC nor Pattern circles. They simply consume too much real estate and contradict the very essence of why we in Pattern moved to quiet our models. Noise reduction footprint was at the core of that effort some 25 years ago.
?
As my good friend Dean Pappas?and I have discussed?on many occasions, rolling loops, segments, variations, etc. are just as neat as circles and consume no more footprint than the typical schedule would. Oh BTW, these are far less difficult to judge objectively
?
MattK
?
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Tue, Sep 22, 2009 10:08 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
It's funny.? I brought my 40% Carden out of mothballs last weekend to work on the F3M stuff and all I wanted to do was fly it like a pattern airplane.? Ofcourse it doesn't quite?measure up, but I found that I really have no enthusiasm left for wapping through rolls where the only?skill involved is being able to stop on time.? I admit, on the last flight of the day I digressed and did about 10 minutes of 3d-ish garbage,?until I finally realized that it was really?not?very satisfying.? Foamies are more fun these days than knocking the sticks around on a 40 % gasser.?? I guess I'm just getting old...
?
Ed
?
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:44:06 -0700
> From: seefo at san.rr.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
>
> Vince,
>
> The "Slow Roll" in IAC does not equate to a pattern slow roll. The IAC
> Slow Roll is just a roll, and the term slow is used to differentiate it
> from a point roll or snap roll. In truth, the IAC slow roll is never
> flown at anything but maximum roll rate available.
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Yes, partial rolling circles are introduced in the Intermediate
> > class. As we know, there is not way to do rollers by rolling fast.
> > IMAC is missing to introduce the slow roll in Sportsman's class. I am
> > not sure why since IAC includes the slow roll.
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now. =
_______________________________________________? NSRCA-discussion mailing list? NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org? http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion?
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090924/211fdef1/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list