[NSRCA-discussion] unknowns

[Koenig, Tom]

Ron and all,

I LOVE your suggestion. At least then we may have a chance of obtaining the correct placings and/or the correct world champion?
Also-do not forget the cost savings to the organisation in that the airfares will be considerably cheaper by obtaining more 'local' judges. This is a big driver for the 'European' hosts....and why countries like Australia and NZ tend be disregarded if at all possible. We have issues in that Southern hemisphere countries always come from Winter climates where we have limited oppertunities to actually prepare/practice for a Northern (summer)world champs.

I have also heard suggestions from W/C contest pilots ( not just the aussie team btw), that the they wished they could not be 'identified'i.e that they be infront of some sort of screen whereby the judges could not identify the actual pilot.

Sure-some models could be used as a way of identifying the pilot, but there are plenty of the 'same' models being used these days.

I thought that was a cool and perhaps 'do-able' thing? More realistic than some sort of computerised/video 'tracking', despite such technology existing.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 4:57
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns

I smile every time I think about this:  The F3A World Championships host gets a list of potential judges from which to pick.  The total list is  predominantly European judges.  Most F3A WCs end up with predominantly European judges. The preponderance of European judges
dictates how judging will be done.   However, what if the list of
judges for the 2111 F3A WC is mostly made up of a judge from the U.S., Canada, Mexico, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, China, Japan, Argentina, Venezuela, etc , such that it that it is NOT made
up of predominantly European judges?  Who gets to pick the judges?
As the host organization, the NSRCA does.

Ron VP

On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Don Ramsey wrote:

> Matt,
>
> You will be disappointed to know that all the World Judges want to
> have rolling circles.  I objected strongly and thought I made a good
> argument; loss of fields, over houses, too much real estate, etc.
> But, they still want the rolling circles in all future patterns and
> especially F patterns.  It sure limits the number of fields that can
> fly those patterns unless the pilots decide to roll in.
>
> Don
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of rcmaster199 at aol.com
>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 11:32 AM
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
>
>
>
> It seems to me that we keep "learning" the same lessons but some just
> never get the memo. Rolling circles are very neat differentiating
> maneuvers BUT not desirable in neither IMAC nor Pattern circles. They
> simply consume too much real estate and contradict the very essence of
> why we in Pattern moved to quiet our models. Noise reduction footprint
> was at the core of that effort some 25 years ago.
>
>
>
> As my good friend Dean Pappas and I have discussed on many occasions,
> rolling loops, segments, variations, etc. are just as neat as circles
> and consume no more footprint than the typical schedule would. Oh BTW,
> these are far less difficult to judge objectively
>
>
>
> MattK
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Sent: Tue, Sep 22, 2009 10:08 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
>
> It's funny.  I brought my 40% Carden out of mothballs last weekend to
> work on the F3M stuff and all I wanted to do was fly it like a pattern
> airplane.  Ofcourse it doesn't quite measure up, but I found that I
> really have no enthusiasm left for wapping through
> rolls where the only skill involved is being able to stop on time.
> I admit, on the last flight of the day I digressed and did about 10
> minutes of 3d-ish garbage, until I finally realized that it was really
> not very satisfying.  Foamies are more fun these days than
> knocking the sticks around on a 40 % gasser.   I guess I'm just
> getting old...
>
> Ed
>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:44:06 -0700
> > From: seefo at san.rr.com
> > To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] unknowns
> >
> > Vince,
> >
> > The "Slow Roll" in IAC does not equate to a pattern slow roll.
> The IAC
> > Slow Roll is just a roll, and the term slow is used to
> differentiate it
> > from a point roll or snap roll. In truth, the IAC slow roll is never
> > flown at anything but maximum roll rate available.
> >
> > -Doug
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, partial rolling circles are introduced in the Intermediate
> > > class. As we know, there is not way to do rollers by rolling fast.
> > > IMAC is missing to introduce the slow roll in Sportsman's
> class. I am
> > > not sure why since IAC includes the slow roll.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up
> now. =
>
> _______________________________________________  NSRCA-discussion
> mailing list  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  http://
> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

************************************************************************
*PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
be confidential. If received in error, please delete all
copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or
dissemination of this email or its attachments is
prohibited without the consent of the sender.

WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty
is given that this email or its attachments are virus free.
Before opening or using attachments, please check for
viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any
affected attachments.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
and with authority, states them to be the views of the
organisation.
************************************************************************