[NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?

Fri Jul 31 08:55:40 AKDT 2009

Sometimes they do. :)

John Pavlick

--- On Fri, 7/31/09, Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
To: jpavlick at idseng.com, "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 12:43 PM

They should bow out of respect.

 Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com

From: John Pavlick <jpavlick at idseng.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 12:29:51 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?

Embarrassed by flying on 72? Huh? Try riding an old  Harley with a drum brake on the front wheel (and a shift pedal on the right side) into a bar with a bunch of rice burners parked out front! LOL

John Pavlick 

--- On Fri, 7/31/09, mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com> wrote:

From: mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 12:16 PM

I'm still hanging on to 72 for a bunch of reasons and I can tell you that using 72 at the national site is a bad idea. 4 sites and you don't really ever feel safe. I will have 2.4 next time I fly there. 72 is almost like having your own frequency because so many have gone to 2.4. Having 72 this year at the Nats was a bit of an embarrasment for me. It's just that my radio works so well that I hate to change anything. 9 years old and I didn't want to upgrade it but I still love it and I like red shirts too. I guess I got a good one. Mike

--- On Fri, 7/31/09, Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com> wrote:

> From: Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
> To: jpavlick at idseng.com, "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:09 AM
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> There is
> nothing in the works to commit
> the entire site or the NATS to 2.4Ghz SS only. 
>  
> 
> 
>   
> 
> Tony
> Stillman, President 
> 
> Radio
> South, Inc. 
> 
> 139 Altama
> Connector,
>  Box 322 
> 
> Brunswick,
>  GA   31525 
> 
> 1-800-962-7802 
> 
> www.radiosouthrc.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Pavlick
> 
> Sent: Friday,
> July 31, 2009 11:20
> AM
> 
> To: General
>  pattern discussion
> 
> Subject: Re:
> [NSRCA-discussion]
> Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010? 
> 
>    
> 
> 
>  
>   
>   
>   Go from 72 to SS? Come on
> Joe, I can't
>   handle this kind of change. I just got rid of my analog
> cell phone (the new
>   digital one drops calls all the time - never happened
> with my old phone) and
>   now I have to ride a bike that has no kick starter
> (5-speed Hog). Now you
>   want me to "update" my toy airplane radio too?
> This is just too
>   much! LOL 
>   
>   
>     
>   
>   
>   John Pavlick
> 
>   
> 
>   --- On Fri, 7/31/09,
> Joe Lachowski < jlachow at hotmail.com
> >
>   wrote: 
>   
>   
> 
>   From: Joe Lachowski < jlachow at hotmail.com >
> 
>   Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the
> Nats in 2010?
> 
>   To: "NSRCA Discussion List"
>   <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
>   Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 8:36 AM 
>   It really isn't just about
> cutting costs either. It
>   is also about other AMA membership complaining about the
> site not being
>   available for their use. You would not believe the number
> of complaints AMA
>   has had about the AMA site being tied up. That is why the
> overall Nats at the
>   site has been shortened in length. 
> 
>    
> 
>   If you are on 72, better plan on moving over to SS in the
> future. I've heard
>   rumours that the AMA has been considering making the AMA
> site SS only in the
>   future.
> 
>     
>   
>   
>   
>   Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009
>   20:57:16 -0700
> 
>   From: homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com
> 
>   To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 
>   Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the
> Nats in 2010? 
>   
>    
>     
>     This is really funny.
>     They want to bring the nats to 2 weeks to cut costs. I
> am sure they make
>     money the way it is. Take this for what it is, heresay,
> but  I heard
>     that the members of the club were complaining that the
> nats takes too much
>     of their time away from their field for them to fly.
> Wasn't the field built
>     for a localized nats site? And I'm pretty sure we
> all paid for it. The ama
>     will lose out if they go to a 2 weeks nats IMO. Wait
> till they see entry's
>     decline.  
>     
>     Chris
>  
>     
>     
>       
>     
>     
>       
>     
>     
>       
>     
>     
> 
>     
> 
>     --- On Thu, 7/30/09,
> Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
>     wrote: 
>     
> 
>     From: Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
> 
>     Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate
> the Nats in 2010?
> 
>     To: "' General pattern discussion '"
>     <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
>     Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 12:55
> PM 
>     
>     
>     That
> is a possibility
>     also.  AMA is thinking about returning the NATS to
> a 2 week all-events
>     NATS like used to be done.  If all events are
> together, HQ can put all
>     costs into one effort.  If they are all split up,
> Each group would
>     have more costs to deal with due to the fact that HQ
> can’t send a group of
>     people to every site. 
>     
>      
> 
>     
>     Tony
> Stillman,
>     President 
>     Radio
> South, Inc. 
>     139
> Altama Connector,
>     Box 322 
>     Brunswick,
>  GA   31525 
>     1-800-962-7802
> 
>     www.radiosouthrc.com
> 
>     
>     
>     
>     From:
>     nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>     [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
> On Behalf Of Tim
> Taylor
> 
>     Sent:
> Thursday, July 30, 2009
>     3:39 PM
> 
>     To:
> General
>      pattern discussion
> 
>     Subject:
> Re:
>     [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in
> 2010? 
>       
>     
>      
>       
>       
>       It was done, It was called
> NPAC 
>       
>       
>         
>       
>       
>       Tim
> 
>       
> 
>       --- On Thu,
> 7/30/09, Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>
>       wrote: 
>       
>       
>       
> 
>       From: Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>
> 
>       Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate
> the Nats in 2010?
> 
>       To: " General pattern discussion 
>       " <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
>       Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 2:06
> PM 
>       
>       
>       Why not allow the SIGS to do
> their own thing?
>       IMAC and NSRCA do not need to share a site. The LSF
> can find a site for
>       the soaring NATS. Pylon knows what venues work for
> them and so on. FF can
>       do their own thing as well. Why tie soaring and FF
> together and so on??
> 
>       
> 
>       
> 
>       Tony wrote:  
>       
>       
>       Matt:
> 
>       Yes, it is just difficult to tell if it is actually
> feasible…  The
>       problem is that it requires a large site for
> Pattern/Pylon/IMAC and will
>       require another large site for Soaring/Outdoor
> FF.  It may be very
>       difficult to actually find places that can handle
> this group. 
>       
>        
> 
>        
> 
>       
>       Tony
> Stillman,
>       President 
>       
>       Radio
> South, Inc. 
>       139
> Altama
>       Connector, Box 
>        322 
>       Brunswick, GA
>  
>  31525 
>        1-800-962-7802 
> 
>       www.radiosouthrc.com
> 
>       
>       
>       
>       
>       
>         
>       
> 
>       -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
>       
>       _______________________________________________
> 
>       NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 
>       NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 
>       http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
>       
>       
>      
>     
>       
>     
> 
>     -----Inline Attachment Follows----- 
>     
>     _______________________________________________
> 
>     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 
>     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 
>     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
>     
>     
>    
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   Windows Live™
> Hotmail®: Celebrate the moment with
>   your favorite sports pics. Check it out.  
>   
> 
>   -----Inline Attachment Follows----- 
>   
>   _______________________________________________
> 
>   NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> 
>   NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> 
>   http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
>   
>   
>  
> 
> 
>    
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090731/80adc834/attachment.html>