[NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
Ed Alt
ed_alt at hotmail.com
Fri Jul 31 08:58:47 AKDT 2009
Are you sure they’re not just wharfing up a hairball? J
Sorry, I just couldn’t resist!
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Pavlick
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 12:56 PM
To: General pattern discussion; Bob Kane
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
Sometimes they do. :)
John Pavlick
--- On Fri, 7/31/09, Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
To: jpavlick at idseng.com, "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 12:43 PM
They should bow out of respect.
Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com
_____
From: John Pavlick <jpavlick at idseng.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 12:29:51 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
Embarrassed by flying on 72? Huh? Try riding an old Harley with a drum brake on the front wheel (and a shift pedal on the right side) into a bar with a bunch of rice burners parked out front! LOL
John Pavlick
--- On Fri, 7/31/09, mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 12:16 PM
I'm still hanging on to 72 for a bunch of reasons and I can tell you that using 72 at the national site is a bad idea. 4 sites and you don't really ever feel safe. I will have 2.4 next time I fly there. 72 is almost like having your own frequency because so many have gone to 2.4. Having 72 this year at the Nats was a bit of an embarrasment for me. It's just that my radio works so well that I hate to change anything. 9 years old and I didn't want to upgrade it but I still love it and I like red shirts too. I guess I got a good one. Mike
--- On Fri, 7/31/09, Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=tony@radiosouthrc.com> > wrote:
> From: Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=tony@radiosouthrc.com> >
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
> To: jpavlick at idseng.com <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=jpavlick@idseng.com> , "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> >
> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:09 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> There is
> nothing in the works to commit
> the entire site or the NATS to 2.4Ghz SS only.
>
>
>
>
>
> Tony
> Stillman, President
>
> Radio
> South, Inc.
>
> 139 Altama
> Connector,
> Box 322
>
> Brunswick,
> GA 31525
>
> 1-800-962-7802
>
> www.radiosouthrc.com <http://www.radiosouthrc.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org>
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org> ] On Behalf Of John Pavlick
>
> Sent: Friday,
> July 31, 2009 11:20
> AM
>
> To: General
> pattern discussion
>
> Subject: Re:
> [NSRCA-discussion]
> Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Go from 72 to SS? Come on
> Joe, I can't
> handle this kind of change. I just got rid of my analog
> cell phone (the new
> digital one drops calls all the time - never happened
> with my old phone) and
> now I have to ride a bike that has no kick starter
> (5-speed Hog). Now you
> want me to "update" my toy airplane radio too?
> This is just too
> much! LOL
>
>
>
>
>
> John Pavlick
>
>
>
> --- On Fri, 7/31/09,
> Joe Lachowski < jlachow at hotmail.com <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=jlachow@hotmail.com>
> >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Joe Lachowski < jlachow at hotmail.com <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=jlachow@hotmail.com> >
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the
> Nats in 2010?
>
> To: "NSRCA Discussion List"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> >
>
> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 8:36 AM
> It really isn't just about
> cutting costs either. It
> is also about other AMA membership complaining about the
> site not being
> available for their use. You would not believe the number
> of complaints AMA
> has had about the AMA site being tied up. That is why the
> overall Nats at the
> site has been shortened in length.
>
>
>
> If you are on 72, better plan on moving over to SS in the
> future. I've heard
> rumours that the AMA has been considering making the AMA
> site SS only in the
> future.
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009
> 20:57:16 -0700
>
> From: homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=homeremodeling2003@yahoo.com>
>
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the
> Nats in 2010?
>
>
>
> This is really funny.
> They want to bring the nats to 2 weeks to cut costs. I
> am sure they make
> money the way it is. Take this for what it is, heresay,
> but I heard
> that the members of the club were complaining that the
> nats takes too much
> of their time away from their field for them to fly.
> Wasn't the field built
> for a localized nats site? And I'm pretty sure we
> all paid for it. The ama
> will lose out if they go to a 2 weeks nats IMO. Wait
> till they see entry's
> decline.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 7/30/09,
> Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=tony@radiosouthrc.com> >
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=tony@radiosouthrc.com> >
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate
> the Nats in 2010?
>
> To: "' General pattern discussion '"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> >
>
> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 12:55
> PM
>
>
> That
> is a possibility
> also. AMA is thinking about returning the NATS to
> a 2 week all-events
> NATS like used to be done. If all events are
> together, HQ can put all
> costs into one effort. If they are all split up,
> Each group would
> have more costs to deal with due to the fact that HQ
> can’t send a group of
> people to every site.
>
>
>
>
> Tony
> Stillman,
> President
> Radio
> South, Inc.
> 139
> Altama Connector,
> Box 322
> Brunswick,
> GA 31525
> 1-800-962-7802
>
> www.radiosouthrc.com <http://www.radiosouthrc.com/>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org>
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org> ]
> On Behalf Of Tim
> Taylor
>
> Sent:
> Thursday, July 30, 2009
> 3:39 PM
>
> To:
> General
> pattern discussion
>
> Subject:
> Re:
> [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in
> 2010?
>
>
>
>
>
> It was done, It was called
> NPAC
>
>
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> --- On Thu,
> 7/30/09, Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wemodels@cox.net> >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wemodels@cox.net> >
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate
> the Nats in 2010?
>
> To: " General pattern discussion
> " <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> >
>
> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 2:06
> PM
>
>
> Why not allow the SIGS to do
> their own thing?
> IMAC and NSRCA do not need to share a site. The LSF
> can find a site for
> the soaring NATS. Pylon knows what venues work for
> them and so on. FF can
> do their own thing as well. Why tie soaring and FF
> together and so on??
>
>
>
>
>
> Tony wrote:
>
>
> Matt:
>
> Yes, it is just difficult to tell if it is actually
> feasible… The
> problem is that it requires a large site for
> Pattern/Pylon/IMAC and will
> require another large site for Soaring/Outdoor
> FF. It may be very
> difficult to actually find places that can handle
> this group.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tony
> Stillman,
> President
>
> Radio
> South, Inc.
> 139
> Altama
> Connector, Box
> 322
> Brunswick, GA
>
> 31525
> 1-800-962-7802
>
> www.radiosouthrc.com <http://www.radiosouthrc.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Windows Live™
> Hotmail®: Celebrate the moment with
> your favorite sports pics. Check it out.
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090731/5ce0078e/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list