[NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 31 08:43:45 AKDT 2009
They should bow out of respect.
Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com
________________________________
From: John Pavlick <jpavlick at idseng.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 12:29:51 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
Embarrassed by flying on 72? Huh? Try riding an old Harley with a drum brake on the front wheel (and a shift pedal on the right side) into a bar with a bunch of rice burners parked out front! LOL
John Pavlick
--- On Fri, 7/31/09, mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>From: mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
>To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 12:16 PM
>
>
>I'm still hanging on to 72 for a bunch of reasons and I can tell you that using 72 at the national site is a bad idea. 4 sites and you don't really ever feel safe. I will have 2.4 next time I fly there. 72 is almost like having your own frequency because so many have gone to 2.4. Having 72 this year at the Nats was a bit of an embarrasment for me. It's just that my radio works so well that I hate to change anything. 9 years old and I didn't want to upgrade it but I still love it and I like red shirts too. I guess I got a good one. Mike
>
>--- On Fri, 7/31/09, Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
> Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
>> To: jpavlick at idseng.com, "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:09 AM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> There is
>> nothing in the works to commit
>> the entire site or the NATS to 2.4Ghz SS only.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Tony
>> Stillman, President
>>
>> Radio
>> South, Inc.
>>
>> 139 Altama
>> Connector,
>> Box 322
>>
>> Brunswick,
>> GA 31525
>>
>> 1-800-962-7802
>>
>> www.radiosouthrc.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:
>> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Pavlick
>>
>> Sent: Friday,
>> July 31, 2009 11:20
>> AM
>>
>> To: General
>> pattern discussion
>>
>>
> Subject: Re:
>> [NSRCA-discussion]
>> Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Go from 72 to SS? Come on
>> Joe, I can't
>> handle this kind of change. I just got rid of my analog
>> cell phone (the new
>> digital one drops calls all the time - never happened
>> with my old phone) and
>> now I have to ride a bike that has no kick starter
>> (5-speed Hog). Now you
>> want me to "update" my toy airplane radio too?
>> This is just too
>> much! LOL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> John Pavlick
>>
>>
>>
>
>> --- On Fri, 7/31/09,
>> Joe Lachowski < jlachow at hotmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Joe Lachowski < jlachow at hotmail.com >
>>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the
>> Nats in 2010?
>>
>> To: "NSRCA Discussion List"
>> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 8:36 AM
>
>> It really isn't just about
>> cutting costs either. It
>> is also about other AMA membership complaining about the
>> site not being
>> available for their use. You would not believe the number
>> of complaints AMA
>> has had about the AMA site being tied up. That is why the
>> overall Nats at the
>> site has been shortened in length.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you are on 72, better plan on moving over to SS in the
>> future. I've heard
>> rumours that the AMA has been considering making the AMA
>> site SS only in the
>> future.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul
> 2009
>> 20:57:16 -0700
>>
>> From: homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com
>>
>> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the
>> Nats in 2010?
>>
>>
>>
>> This is really funny.
>> They want to bring the nats to 2 weeks to cut costs. I
>> am sure they make
>> money the way it is. Take this for what it is, heresay,
>> but I heard
>>
> that the members of the club were complaining that the
>> nats takes too much
>> of their time away from their field for them to fly.
>> Wasn't the field built
>> for a localized nats site? And I'm pretty sure we
>> all paid for it. The ama
>> will lose out if they go to a 2 weeks nats IMO. Wait
>> till they see entry's
>> decline.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- On Thu, 7/30/09,
>> Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate
>> the Nats in 2010?
>>
>> To: "' General pattern discussion '"
>> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 12:55
>> PM
>>
>>
>> That
>> is a possibility
>> also. AMA is thinking about returning the NATS to
>> a 2 week all-events
>> NATS like used to be done. If all events are
>> together, HQ can put all
>> costs into one effort. If they are all split up,
>> Each group would
>> have more costs to deal with due to the fact that HQ
>> can’t send a group of
>> people to every site.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Tony
>> Stillman,
>> President
>> Radio
>> South, Inc.
>> 139
>> Altama Connector,
>> Box 322
>> Brunswick,
>> GA 31525
>> 1-800-962-7802
>>
>> www.radiosouthrc.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:
>> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
>> On Behalf Of Tim
>> Taylor
>>
>> Sent:
>> Thursday, July 30, 2009
>> 3:39 PM
>>
>> To:
>> General
>> pattern discussion
>>
>> Subject:
>> Re:
>> [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in
>> 2010?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> It was done, It was called
>> NPAC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>> --- On Thu,
>> 7/30/09, Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate
>> the Nats in 2010?
>>
>> To: " General pattern discussion
>
>> " <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>
>> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 2:06
>> PM
>>
>>
>> Why not allow the SIGS to do
>> their own thing?
>> IMAC and NSRCA do not need to share a site. The LSF
>> can find a site for
>> the soaring NATS. Pylon knows what venues work for
>> them and so on. FF can
>> do their own thing as well. Why tie soaring and FF
>> together and so on??
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>> Tony wrote:
>>
>>
>> Matt:
>>
>> Yes, it is just difficult to tell if it is actually
>> feasible… The
>> problem is that it requires a large site for
>> Pattern/Pylon/IMAC and will
>> require another large site for Soaring/Outdoor
>> FF. It may be very
>> difficult to actually find places that can handle
>> this group.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Tony
>> Stillman,
>> President
>
>>
>> Radio
>> South, Inc.
>> 139
>> Altama
>> Connector, Box
>> 322
>> Brunswick, GA
>>
>> 31525
>> 1-800-962-7802
>>
>> www.radiosouthrc.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Windows Live™
>> Hotmail®: Celebrate the moment with
>> your favorite sports pics. Check it out.
>
>>
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion
> mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090731/8bbaa55f/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list