[NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module

[Vicente "Vince" Bortone]

Actually I remember the 10X been a little faster using 2.4 modules when compared with the 72 Mhz system.   I am not sure about the 9303 but I assume is similar.  



Vicente "Vince" Bortone 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Frackowiak" <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net> 
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:39:44 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module 

I flew the 2.4 module a lot in a 9303 before the pure 2.4 systems came out. No problems, however you do not have some of the nice features that come with the pure 2.4 systems. Such as Modelmatch does not work with the module systems. And the pure 2.4 systems are faster. But reliability is not a concern. 


Tony 





On Aug 25, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Bill Glaze wrote: 




All: 
I bought from a pattern fllyer, a JR 9393 Transmitter and receiver on 72 megs, with a frequency synthesizer,  While I do prefer to fly on 6 meters, I thought I might use this transmitter with a 6 meter synthesizer. 
However, a good friend of mine suggested getting a conversion unit and go directly to 2.4 Gig.  I know that it's  definitely the coming thing, even though I've been satisfied with the older system. 
However, (and this is where my doubt comes in) I was told by a hobby shop owner, that he "doesn't trust the 2.4 module, because, it's a basically a converter, and because the entire system wasn't designed to be used at 2.4 Gig to begin with, he doubts the plug-in module's reliability or safety of flight."  
Any advice will be appreciated. 

Bill Glaze _______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090825/fb09b12c/attachment.html>