<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'><DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
<P>Actually I remember the 10X been a little faster using 2.4 modules when compared with the 72 Mhz system. I am not sure about the 9303 but I assume is similar. </P>
<P> </P>
<P>Vicente "Vince" Bortone<BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "Anthony Frackowiak" <frackowiak@sbcglobal.net><BR>To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:39:44 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central<BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Digital Pug-In module<BR><BR>I flew the 2.4 module a lot in a 9303 before the pure 2.4 systems came out. No problems, however you do not have some of the nice features that come with the pure 2.4 systems. Such as Modelmatch does not work with the module systems. And the pure 2.4 systems are faster. But reliability is not a concern.</P>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Tony</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>
<DIV>
<DIV>On Aug 25, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Bill Glaze wrote:</DIV><BR class=Apple-interchange-newline>
<BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN class=Apple-style-span style="WORD-SPACING: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; orphans: 2; widows: 2; webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; webkit-text-stroke-width: 0">
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>All:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I bought from a pattern fllyer, a JR 9393 Transmitter and receiver on 72 megs, with a frequency synthesizer, While I do prefer to fly on 6 meters, I thought I might use this transmitter with a 6 meter synthesizer.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>However, a good friend of mine suggested getting a conversion unit and go directly to 2.4 Gig. I know that it's definitely the coming thing, even though I've been satisfied with the older system.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>However, (and this is where my doubt comes in) I was told by a hobby shop owner, that he "doesn't trust the 2.4 module, because, it's a basically a converter, and because the entire system wasn't designed to be used at 2.4 Gig to begin with, he doubts the plug-in module's reliability or safety of flight." </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Any advice will be appreciated.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bill Glaze</FONT></DIV>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" target=_blank>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A><BR><A href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target=_blank>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</A></DIV></SPAN></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV><BR>_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</DIV></div></body></html>