[NSRCA-discussion] We aren't behind the times.
Del K. Rykert
drykert2 at rochester.rr.com
Tue Aug 28 07:20:16 AKDT 2007
Re: [NSRCA-discussion] We aren't behind the times.Someone distributed a case load of rose colored eye glasses..? maybe.? grin ..
----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry Stebbins
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] We aren't behind the times.
Seems like we are flogging the dead horse for some other reason than the "Spectators". TOC comparisons are a reach. Most "spectators" are other contestants/helpers. Few wannabes come out unless they are working, and if they have the pattern itch they would be there anyway. Those are they ones we can talk to/explain/cultivate/ let fly after the contest!.
Maybe the old days of short shorts callers could be brought back by developing and forming a set of touring callers--how about calling the Dallas Cheerleaders and see if they would be interested. THAT would probably increase our "Spectator" base. :) :)
Wonder what the underlying reason is for this thread-anyone willing to fess-up?
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: John Pavlick
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] We aren't behind the times.
Uh, what are you guys talking about? Spectators at a Pattern contest? Where are they? Do wives and girlfriends count?
John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com
----- Original Message -----
From: John Gayer
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] We aren't behind the times.
Having a large scoreboard with names(maybe pictures of pilots with airplanes) and raw scores would help. So would providing handouts on the patterns and pattern in general.
Not having been to an IMAC contest in years, are they doing better in providing information to spectators? Are they getting large crowds for the unknowns and freestyles?
The TOC had a large scoreboard that was kept uptodate, as I recall, with raw scores and handed out the patterns being flown.
Must be why they had such large crowds :-)
John
Mark Atwood wrote:
To take that a step further...when was the last time you saw them televise the Figure Skating compulsory rounds...which is basically what we fly...the EXACT same routine. They've dropped the "figures" portion of the competition completely.
But I still think it would be entertaining to see scores...though I agree it is likely to create problems.
-M
On 8/27/07 11:30 PM, "JShulman" <jshulman at cfl.rr.com> wrote:
Has anyone else thought that pattern is just really boring? Lets face it, if you don't enjoy precision flying, there isn't much that can be done to spice it up. It's still the same sequences being flown flight after flight.
As for the scoring real-time... the only one's that it would matter to would be the one's participating in the contest. Not necessarily just the one's in the class, but the one's that stay the extra day to watch. Until we throw in some sort of freestyle or combat, it's just pattern. Who would watch figure skating without music?
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Lance Van Nostrand
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:17 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Are we behind the times?
I'm willing to try things that would make pattern more spectator friendly. I think the reason the lone spectator talking during a flight has such an effect is because its a lone person and talking loud enough that judges can hear is rare. If it became common place we would soon tune it out and spectators would be better able to follow the contest.
Your points are excellent. In my area we don't require judges to initial their scoresheets. I don'tunderstand this and I always initial mine, but I also sometimes put downgrade shorthand next to my scores for pilots that enjoy knowing why they got a certain score. The occasions that pilots have approached me afterwards were supportive and spiritbuilding.
--Lance
----- Original Message -----
From: Woodward, Jim <mailto:jim.woodward at baesystems.com>
To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Are we behind the times?
I heard a story from this years nats where one of the Advanced competitors that was in contention flew a less-than-perfect maneuver, and another pilot who was also in contention (and watching) yelled out an inappropriate remark. I think that audience input or influence is something we should steer away from for precision aerobatics. We certainly do not need it to be quiet like for golf, but direct statements meant to be heard by the judges are not good.
Although slightly off topic - what I do think we should do is post all raw scores every flight for every pilot (I think this is done for the WC). I think this would provide the following opportunities:
1.. The availability of the raw scores would in itself represent and INCREDIBLE judges training tool. Seasoned and new competitor alike could watch flights together, make comments and discuss, then go back later and see if what they thought they saw was in line with the scores for that flight. There is all kinds of opportunity here to facilitate judging training (.. ideas welcome).
2.. Posting of raw scores would allow "judges" to after-the-fact see how they performed compared to their judging partners. There is all kinds of good value that could come from this. Whether noted privately or discussed between each other, it is good from time to time to check yourself.
3.. Posting of raw scores would help keep the honest man honest. By posting raw scores, I think there would be a reduction of bias any way you cut it: Santa-Clausing, Low-balling, "teams", regionality, or other bias' would be removed/reduced if the person knew ahead of time that the judges scores would be posted.
4.. And most importantly, increased "transparency" in the system helps the seasoned and new comer alike understand the process of the contest, scoring, and "how" the 1000, 900, or 800's came to be. I believe that no matter whom you are, you want to leave a contest and feel like you (& everyone) was dealt a fair hand. Transparency is the key to this.
5.. OK - last one - it takes "scoring" which is a topic of much discussion during and after a pattern contest in case you haven't heard, away from a shadowy discussion, and brings to the open this topic which everyone is already discussing. This would do a lot to remove ammunition from the conspiracy theorist and such whom all of our districts have. Transparency is good J
I write none of this from the sour-grapes perspective. I love this stuff. I think the potential benefits from posting the raws would out weight the potential bad, provide more transparency for the competitor and also provide judges training.
Thanks,
Jim W.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of JShulman
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 1:49 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Are we behind the times?
Probably the best reason not to have it...lol. It's bad enough when we screw-up... I mean when a pilot screws-up and you hear all the OOOooooohhhhhhhhhhhh's from the crowd. Now just imagine the uproar when someone gets judged for a maneuver that they are doing all wrong! Total Chaos!
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
On Behalf Of Derek Koopowitz
can you just imagine all the "oohhhss and aahhhs" from the spectators. :)
------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070828/db052ac9/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list