[NSRCA-discussion] Avoidance

[Fred Huber]

So if your memory is correct (and I hope it is)... we already have a rule that works to give someone the option to evade the potential mid-air... reposition, refly the interrupted maneuver and go on... no downgrade.

That would mean its just a matter of educating the judges and the pilots 

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ron Van Putte 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:21 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Avoidance



  This is a 'sticky' area that requires a good CD.  The rules state (this is from memory) that a contestant has the option to repeat an attempt, if his flight is interrupted due to circumstances beyond his control, but only for the maneuver affected and subsequent maneuvers.  I think that, in avoiding a midair collision, the pilot shows some, but not complete control in the situation and the rules still warrants his being allowed to continue the flight, starting with the affected maneuver. 


  Ron Van Putte

  (rearranged for clarity of who's comment I am referring to...)


    On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Jay Marshall wrote:



      I asked this question of a CD once, and also some judges, and was told that there was no escaping a downgrade if you took action to avoid a possible midair. Pilots are also intensely concentrated on their own aircraft and may not see another until it is too late to make a decision on which way to jump. This is why I advocate flying slightly intersecting tracks, say 10 – 20 degrees, rather than parallel tracks at contests.



    -----Original Message-----
    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Richards
    Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:11 PM
    To: NSRCA Mailing List
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Avoidance



    Fred,



    I agree 100%.



    Bob R.



    Fred Huber <fhhuber at clearwire.net> wrote:

      Problem here is... one pilot may not see the other and the one who does see the other may be the lower class pilot, who has had it ground in that he MUST NOT DEVIATE.



      I've heard discussions about close encounters... and what I hear is... "the planes look closer to each other than they are"... "the higher class is always further out"... "ignore the other plane."



      So... what I keep hearing is exactly opposed to any attempt at avoidance for any reason.  Stick to your maneuver sequence at all costs.



      There is no allowance given in the rules for mid-air avoidance... thus the way it is now, whoever flinches can throw out his flight because he's going to get a 0... or maybe a couple of zeros for blowing the maneuver to avoid a mid-air.  (unless the judges would deviate and say "Avoid him and then refly the maneuver") You can bet that 99%+ will wait for the other guy to flinch, especially if they are having a good flight.



      So.. the guy who might be willing to give up his score and avoid... may be the one who doesn't see the mid-air comming and you have the other guy fixated on score... expecting the other guy to get out of his way... SMACK.  So... maybe the pilot who saw it comming "desrrves it".. does that make the other guy who didn't see it comming deserve it?  



      Give the pilots indication they won't be penlized for preventing 2 planes from occupying the same place at the same time... and the guy who sees it comming will be more willing to prevent the collision.



      As long as you have 2 flight lines on the same field flying in essentially the same box... you'll have mid-airs come up.  Yes, USUALLY the higher class pilot flys a bit further out and thus there's little risk.  But some lower class guys learn the box is bigger if you fly further out...  More time between maneuvers... less rush... Easier to be smooth...  And the rules even say you need to be out that far.... (most Sportsman pilots fly a closer line than the prescribed distance out... from what I have observed)



    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.12/462 - Release Date: 10/3/2006
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061005/3addeb99/attachment.html