[NSRCA-discussion] Questions for the experts

Scott McNickle nelson_jett at comcast.net
Tue Aug 20 04:24:41 AKDT 2019


Considering we're doing this on the fly, I think the real-life scores would be:

Whoa, really steep, -2
That was awful, sharp, -2
A little out of the box, -1
Pointing out a little, -.5

Scott


> On August 20, 2019 at 5:01 AM Randy Forbus via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
>     8
>     8.5
>     8
>     9
> 
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------
>     From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of davel322 via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>     Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 3:37 AM
>     To: tocdon at netscape.net <tocdon at netscape.net>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>     Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Questions for the experts
>      
>     This will be fun!
> 
>     8.5
>     8
>     9
>     9.5
> 
>     Regards, 
> 
>     Dave
> 
>     Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note8.
> 
>     Apologies in advance for any typos undoubtedly introduced by auto correct and / or talk to text. 
> 
>     -------- Original message --------
>     From: Don Szczur via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>     Date: 8/19/19 22:04 (GMT-05:00)
>     To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>     Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Questions for the experts
> 
>     Half Reverse Cuban 8, turnaround maneuver. 
> 
>     Pilot 1 does a 68 degree angle, no other defects, what is the score?
>     Pilot 2 does his first radius at about quarter that of the 5/8 loop.  No other defects- what is the score?
>     Pilot 3 does the maneuver with correct geometry and radius segments, but the maneuver is 15 percent out of the box- no other defects- what is the score?
>     Pilot 4 angles (cants) the  entire maneuver out about 5-10 degrees to keep it in the box, does correct geometry and radius segments and there are no other defects- what is the score?
> 
>     Thanks much,
>     Don
> 
> 
 

> _______________________________________________
>     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20190820/f3cc9a76/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list