[NSRCA-discussion] Questions for the experts
Randy Forbus
rforbus at hotmail.com
Tue Aug 20 01:01:24 AKDT 2019
8
8.5
8
9
________________________________
From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of davel322 via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 3:37 AM
To: tocdon at netscape.net <tocdon at netscape.net>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Questions for the experts
This will be fun!
8.5
8
9
9.5
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note8.
Apologies in advance for any typos undoubtedly introduced by auto correct and / or talk to text.
-------- Original message --------
From: Don Szczur via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: 8/19/19 22:04 (GMT-05:00)
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Questions for the experts
Half Reverse Cuban 8, turnaround maneuver.
Pilot 1 does a 68 degree angle, no other defects, what is the score?
Pilot 2 does his first radius at about quarter that of the 5/8 loop. No other defects- what is the score?
Pilot 3 does the maneuver with correct geometry and radius segments, but the maneuver is 15 percent out of the box- no other defects- what is the score?
Pilot 4 angles (cants) the entire maneuver out about 5-10 degrees to keep it in the box, does correct geometry and radius segments and there are no other defects- what is the score?
Thanks much,
Don
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20190820/8d2ece9a/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list