[NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes

[Curt Oberg]

Don't give the FAA any ideas John.

Curt O

 

  _____  

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of John Pavlick via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 11:12 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes

 

Good point. I have the solution: All electric airplanes must now have a
bright, flashing light on them that indicates that the power system is
active. The light must be clearly visible for at least one mile. 

 

How's that sound? 

 

John Pavlick

Cell: 203-417-4971

 

idslogo2

Integrated Development Services

 

 

 

From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> On Behalf
Of John Fuqua via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 10:39 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes

 

>From a contest management point of view unless the canopy is off the
airplane (nobody wants to leave the canopy off) and you do not have a plug
you cannot tell if a plane in the pits is safe.     One thing I implemented
at my contest last weekend was a deadline beyond which you could not bring
you plane into the pits until it was disarmed.    That seemed to work well
and no one objected.    But back in the pits those without plugs were still
"invisible" as to status.

 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of lucky macy via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 9:21 AM
To: Ken Dunlap; ronlock at comcast.net; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes

 

concur.

  _____  

From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf
of ronlock--- via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 10:17 AM
To: Ken Dunlap; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes 

 

Among our challenges to follow a procedure ....    Plane lands, flight is
complete.   While a helper/ caller, perhaps unfamiliar with that specific
airplane, retrieves it from the runway, the pilot gets involved in a
conversation - how flight went, that he is needed to judge, to call for
someone, else, etc.  Similar items may be pulling on the helper/caller.
Plane now sits where?  For how long?  And is disarmed?   A clearly visible
arming plug would be a big help.

Ron Lockhart

On September 26, 2018 at 8:14 PM Ken Dunlap via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote: 

Well, I am going to chime in with my experience. I use the Arm-safe. I have
over 1000+ flights on airplanes with this system and it has been
bulletproof. I know there are thoughts about single points of failure etc
etc. But here's my experience.. I have never seen an arming system fail, but
I have seen countless airplanes go careening off into fences and fields
because the pilot forgot to deactivate his/her airplane. I am entirely
supportive of an arming rule that requires a hard disconnect of the
airplane.

 

Cheers,

Ken

 


  _____  


 

 


 
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_cam
paign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 

Virus-free.
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_cam
paign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> www.avg.com 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20180927/3985badf/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2903 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20180927/3985badf/attachment.jpg>