[NSRCA-discussion] Zero Judges at WC's

[Jeff Worsham]

Obviously I don’t know squat about the whole process, but was just wondering-  if there’s a 10 judge panel, why can’t 2 of them be zero judges.  I understand if running 2 lines, 5 judges per line, there would need to be 4 more judges paid for.  But aren’t the final rounds flown on one line only with all 10 judges?  If so, why can’t 2 of them be zero judges?   

 

From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Charles Hochhalter via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Reply-To: "cahochhalter at yahoo.com" <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 12:12 PM
To: "nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Zero Judges at WC's

 

The cost to add zero judges would be around 4 -6 grand each unless you pulled from contestants... which probably  wouldnt happen. 

 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

 

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Jeff Worsham via NSRCA-discussion

<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

What would it take for FAI to require a minimum # of zero judges at future WC’s?  IE: at least two designated zero judges required for every semi’s and finals round.  With the increase in complexity of maneuvers in F and unknown sequences, sounds like the judging load may be exceeding what even the most experienced of judges can keep up with at a WC.  On top of increased judging load, add poor visibility, poor conditions, etc and the chance for error goes up even more.  

Jeff

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20171114/4fd343cd/attachment.html>