<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Title content=""><meta name=Keywords content=""><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.yiv6131312123
{mso-style-name:yiv6131312123;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri'>Obviously I don’t know squat about the whole process, but was just wondering- if there’s a 10 judge panel, why can’t 2 of them be zero judges. I understand if running 2 lines, 5 judges per line, there would need to be 4 more judges paid for. But aren’t the final rounds flown on one line only with all 10 judges? If so, why can’t 2 of them be zero judges? <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-family:Calibri;color:black'>From: </span></b><span style='font-family:Calibri;color:black'>NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Charles Hochhalter via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br><b>Reply-To: </b>"cahochhalter@yahoo.com" <cahochhalter@yahoo.com>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br><b>Date: </b>Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 12:12 PM<br><b>To: </b>"nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Zero Judges at WC's<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal>The cost to add zero judges would be around 4 -6 grand each unless you pulled from contestants... which probably wouldnt happen. <o:p></o:p></p><div id="yMail_cursorElementTracker_1510686702330"><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><div id="ymail_android_signature"><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android">Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><blockquote style='margin-left:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:15.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Helvetica;color:#6D00F6'>On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Jeff Worsham via NSRCA-discussion<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Helvetica;color:#6D00F6'><nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div style='border:none;border-left:solid #6D00F6 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 15.0pt;margin-top:7.5pt'><div id=yiv6131312123><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span class=yiv6131312123><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri'>What would it take for FAI to require a minimum # of zero judges at future WC’s? IE: at least two designated zero judges required for every semi’s and finals round. With the increase in complexity of maneuvers in F and unknown sequences, sounds like the judging load may be exceeding what even the most experienced of judges can keep up with at a WC. On top of increased judging load, add poor visibility, poor conditions, etc and the chance for error goes up even more. </span></span><span style='font-family:Calibri'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span class=yiv6131312123><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri'>Jeff</span></span><span style='font-family:Calibri'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal>_______________________________________________<br>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br><a href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" target="_blank">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a> <o:p></o:p></p></div></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal>_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>