[NSRCA-discussion] Lithium batteries news

[Scott McHarg]

I make a motion that Mark Atwood pony up and get the licensing of this
technology handled.  We're all behind you.  If TU (a Texas University not
THE University of Texas) has the patent, it won't be cheap!

For information on licensing this technology, or additional technology
information, contact: Betsy Merrick <bmerrick at otc.utexas.edu>, Office of
Technology Commercialization, (512) 232-7699.

*Scott A. McHarg*
VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
Texas A&M University
PPL - ASEL
Remote Pilot Certified Under FAA Part 107

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Maybe,
>
> But if this is indeed true, you won’t be buying a 5s5000, but rather a
> 5s15000
>
> I’d pay $140 for that :)
>
> But again, the article states overtly that the core materials used are
> more common substituting Sodium for Lithium.  So once the product becomes
> commoditized, you would expect the costs to actually be lower than todays
> batteries.
>
>
> *MARK **ATWOOD*
> o.  (440) 229-2502
> c.  (216) 316-2489
> e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
>
> *Paragon Consulting, Inc.*
> 5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
> www.paragon-inc.com
>
> <http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
> *Powering The Digital Experience*
>
> On Mar 8, 2017, at 10:46 AM, Matthew Finley <rcfin02 at msn.com> wrote:
>
> Probably will be around $140 bucks for a single 5s 5000 pack.... I'm
> guessing
>
>
>
> Matthew E Finley
> Q.C.I Technical Assistant
> 248-794-8487 <(248)%20794-8487> mobile
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.
> org>
> Date: 3/8/17 10:34 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Tom Stennis <tomstennis at gmail.com>, General pattern discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Lithium batteries news
>
> The article specifically mentions and 3X improvement in energy density, so
> that bodes extremely well for weight.  This almost feels too good to be
> true, but this group has led the path from the onset in battery technology,
> so there should certainly be optimism.  Just wonder what the time to market
> reality would be.
>
>
> *MARK **ATWOOD*
> o.  (440) 229-2502
> c.  (216) 316-2489
> e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
>
> *Paragon Consulting, Inc.*
> 5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
> www.paragon-inc.com
>
> <http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
> *Powering The Digital Experience*
>
> On Mar 8, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Tom Stennis via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> Sounds good I wonder how the weight compares with the Lipo we now use
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 7, 2017, at 9:43 PM, Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> Good news continues to come for those of us who use LiPo batteries.
>
> A team from the University of Texas, led by 94-year-old John Goodenough
> has developed what is being called an "all-solid-state"
> <http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2017/EE/C6EE02888H#!divAbstract>
>  lithium-ion battery cell. Batteries constructed using the new technology
> are noncombustible, have a long cycle life, and boast much faster rates of
> charge and discharge.
>
>
>
> https://news.utexas.edu/2017/02/28/goodenough-introduces-
> new-battery-technology
> --
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170308/2f6816e6/attachment.html>