[NSRCA-discussion] Lithium batteries news

[Atwood, Mark]

Maybe,

But if this is indeed true, you won’t be buying a 5s5000, but rather a 5s15000

I’d pay $140 for that :)

But again, the article states overtly that the core materials used are more common substituting Sodium for Lithium.  So once the product becomes commoditized, you would expect the costs to actually be lower than todays batteries.


MARK ATWOOD
o.  (440) 229-2502
c.  (216) 316-2489
e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com<mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>

Paragon Consulting, Inc.
5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>

<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
Powering The Digital Experience

On Mar 8, 2017, at 10:46 AM, Matthew Finley <rcfin02 at msn.com<mailto:rcfin02 at msn.com>> wrote:

Probably will be around $140 bucks for a single 5s 5000 pack.... I'm guessing



Matthew E Finley
Q.C.I Technical Assistant
248-794-8487 mobile


-------- Original message --------
From: "Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Date: 3/8/17 10:34 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Tom Stennis <tomstennis at gmail.com<mailto:tomstennis at gmail.com>>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Lithium batteries news

The article specifically mentions and 3X improvement in energy density, so that bodes extremely well for weight.  This almost feels too good to be true, but this group has led the path from the onset in battery technology, so there should certainly be optimism.  Just wonder what the time to market reality would be.


MARK ATWOOD
o.  (440) 229-2502
c.  (216) 316-2489
e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com<mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>

Paragon Consulting, Inc.
5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>

<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
Powering The Digital Experience

On Mar 8, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Tom Stennis via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:

Sounds good I wonder how the weight compares with the Lipo we now use

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 7, 2017, at 9:43 PM, Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:


Good news continues to come for those of us who use LiPo batteries.

A team from the University of Texas, led by 94-year-old John Goodenough has developed what is being called an "all-solid-state"<http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2017/EE/C6EE02888H#!divAbstract> lithium-ion battery cell. Batteries constructed using the new technology are noncombustible, have a long cycle life, and boast much faster rates of charge and discharge.



https://news.utexas.edu/2017/02/28/goodenough-introduces-new-battery-technology

--
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170308/2c72310d/attachment.html>