[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced Sequence

[S. McNickle]

The K4's are rather non-intimidating.  Many elements to get right but not much airplane-threatening to someone just moving up.

I like it.

> On June 29, 2017 at 1:10 PM Stuart Chale <schale1 at outlook.com> wrote:
> 
>     That one should be a fun sequence to fly. 
> 
>     Sent from my iPhone
> 
>     On Jun 29, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > wrote:
> 
> 
>         > > 
> >         I flew the Advanced as well twice through last weekend, and it seemed to flow very nice, and did not seem to be too power hungry.
> > 
> > 
> >         Matthew E. Finley
> >         QCI - Technology Assistant
> >         614-557-3846 Mobile
> >         mfinley at qcillc.com mailto:mfinley at qcillc.com
> > 
> > 
> >         ---------------------------------------------
> >         From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org > on behalf of S. McNickle via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org >
> >         Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:45:41 AM
> >         To: General pattern discussion
> >         Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced Sequence
> >          
> > 
> >         I flew the proposed Advanced sequence last night and liked it a lot.  I think it flows nicely and the new maneuvers are interesting.
> > 
> >         I didn't really think the one extra K4 maneuver made it too hard.
> > 
> > 
> >         Scott, D4
> > 
> >     > 
>         > >         _______________________________________________
> >         NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >         NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >         http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > 
> >     > 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170629/57a65b3d/attachment.html>