[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced Sequence

[Stuart Chale]

That one should be a fun sequence to fly.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 29, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:


I flew the Advanced as well twice through last weekend, and it seemed to flow very nice, and did not seem to be too power hungry.


Matthew E. Finley
QCI - Technology Assistant
614-557-3846 Mobile
mfinley at qcillc.com<mailto:mfinley at qcillc.com>

________________________________
From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>> on behalf of S. McNickle via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:45:41 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced Sequence


I flew the proposed Advanced sequence last night and liked it a lot.  I think it flows nicely and the new maneuvers are interesting.

I didn't really think the one extra K4 maneuver made it too hard.


Scott, D4

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170629/c687b39c/attachment.html>