[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced Sequence

[Jeff and Claire]

When I flew it, it felt easier to me than what we are doing now.  

 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of S. McNickle via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 11:48 AM
To: Matthew Finley; General pattern discussion; Stuart Chale
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced Sequence

 

The K4's are rather non-intimidating.  Many elements to get right but not much airplane-threatening to someone just moving up.

I like it.

On June 29, 2017 at 1:10 PM Stuart Chale <schale1 at outlook.com> wrote:

That one should be a fun sequence to fly. 

Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 29, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

I flew the Advanced as well twice through last weekend, and it seemed to flow very nice, and did not seem to be too power hungry.

 

Matthew E. Finley
QCI - Technology Assistant
614-557-3846 Mobile
mfinley at qcillc.com

  _____  

From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of S. McNickle via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:45:41 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed Advanced Sequence

 

I flew the proposed Advanced sequence last night and liked it a lot.  I think it flows nicely and the new maneuvers are interesting.

I didn't really think the one extra K4 maneuver made it too hard.

 

Scott, D4

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170629/9a4bb344/attachment.html>