[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

[Raymond Paul Mathis]

A man of you goodness should get at least 10%  for such a great, handsome and distinguished photo.

Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 24, 2017, at 6:25 PM, Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> Absolutely!!!
> 
> Ronald the Elder
> 
>> On Feb 24, 2017, at 3:04 PM, Earl Haury via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I’m for a 2% bonus for every year over 70!
>>  
>> Earl
>>  
>> From: S. McNickle via NSRCA-discussion
>> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 2:56 PM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals
>>  
>> As Mike Murphy points out, rules intended to even the playing field often have unintended consequences.  Indy racing fans may remember when there was a special rule for 'stock block' engines to encourage development of cheaper engines... until Team Penske developed, at great cost,a stock block that met all the rules and blew everybody away.
>>  
>> Might be possible to find the right number, but I think it will be tough.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170225/a1e6d3d1/attachment.html>