[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals
Ronald Van Putte
vanputter at gmail.com
Fri Feb 24 14:26:01 AKST 2017
Absolutely!!!
Ronald the Elder
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 3:04 PM, Earl Haury via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> I’m for a 2% bonus for every year over 70!
>
> Earl
>
> From: S. McNickle via NSRCA-discussion <>
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 2:56 PM
> To: General pattern discussion <>
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals
>
> As Mike Murphy points out, rules intended to even the playing field often have unintended consequences. Indy racing fans may remember when there was a special rule for 'stock block' engines to encourage development of cheaper engines... until Team Penske developed, at great cost,a stock block that met all the rules and blew everybody away.
>
> Might be possible to find the right number, but I think it will be tough.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170224/5b053376/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list