[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

[Ronald Van Putte]

Uuuuh, yeah, I guess.


> On Feb 24, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Raymond Paul Mathis via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> A man of you goodness should get at least 10%  for such a great, handsome and distinguished photo.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 6:25 PM, Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
> 
>> Absolutely!!!
>> 
>> Ronald the Elder
>> 
>>> On Feb 24, 2017, at 3:04 PM, Earl Haury via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’m for a 2% bonus for every year over 70!
>>>  
>>> Earl
>>>  
>>> From: S. McNickle via NSRCA-discussion <>
>>> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 2:56 PM
>>> To: General pattern discussion <>
>>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals
>>>  
>>> As Mike Murphy points out, rules intended to even the playing field often have unintended consequences.  Indy racing fans may remember when there was a special rule for 'stock block' engines to encourage development of cheaper engines... until Team Penske developed, at great cost,a stock block that met all the rules and blew everybody away.
>>>  
>>> Might be possible to find the right number, but I think it will be tough.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>_______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>_______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170225/7dc6b21c/attachment.html>