[NSRCA-discussion] Judging

[John Gayer]

Different case. For the humpty example, the pilot executed the wrong 
maneuver with no attempt to fix the problem. The analogous situation 
would be if the pilot pulled to vertical and then realized his error and 
pushed back to a 45 upline and continued with the laydown humpty. Should 
be a downgrade.

John

On 8/7/2017 9:08 AM, Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
>
> Zero. Wrong maneuver. Similar situation was written up by Jon Carter 
> in the K Factor a couple years ago, where a laydown Humpty was called 
> for, but pilot did 90 degrees to vertical. I said 6 pt downgrade, for 
> each 45 degree over rotation, he said zero for wrong maneuver. He won!
>
> Jon
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Monday, August 7, 2017 Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion 
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> Another judging question:
>
> Senario: An upline is flown that requires no rolls. The pilot executes 
> a partial roll that turns about 75 degrees then immediately returns to 
> vertical as specified in the maneuver description.
>
> Two choices seem to be available:
>
> 1. 0 the maneuver because 2 turns have been made that require 5 pt 
> downgrade each.  Errors are initial roll and roll that returns the 
> mode to the correct attitude.
>
> 2. Score it a 5 because only one error was made and a correction was 
> made to return the model to the correct attitude.  Do not downgrade 
> the correction.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170807/a2a9d4a0/attachment.html>