[NSRCA-discussion] Judging

[Vicente Bortone]

Hi Jon,

I was judging that one and I remember I zeroed the maneuver.   It was
interesting situation for sure.

This is good discussion.



On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:08 AM Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Zero. Wrong maneuver. Similar situation was written up by Jon Carter in
> the K Factor a couple years ago, where a laydown Humpty was called for, but
> pilot did 90 degrees to vertical. I said 6 pt downgrade, for each 45 degree
> over rotation, he said zero for wrong maneuver. He won!
>
> Jon
> ------------------------------
> On Monday, August 7, 2017 Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> Another judging question:
>
>
>
> Senario:  An upline is flown that requires no rolls.  The pilot executes a
> partial roll that turns about 75 degrees then immediately returns to
> vertical as specified in the maneuver description.
>
>
>
> Two choices seem to be available:
>
> 1.        0 the maneuver because 2 turns have been made that require 5 pt
> downgrade each.  Errors are initial roll and roll that returns the mode to
> the correct attitude.
>
> 2.        Score it a 5 because only one error was made and a correction
> was made to return the model to the correct attitude.  Do not downgrade the
> correction.
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-- 
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170807/afc5d150/attachment.html>