[NSRCA-discussion] Competition

[Matthew Finley]

+1



Matthew E Finley
Q.C.I Technical Assistant
248-794-8487 mobile


-------- Original message --------
From: "Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: 9/19/16 5:03 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Stuart Chale <schale1 at outlook.com>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Competition

That was going to be my exact point… that there are millions of golfers, all of whom DO keep score and are attempting the same precision as the pro’s.  They may not fully realize the level of skill required, but they have a good idea, and a complete understanding of the objective.

Sport flyers are not an equal comparison.  They have nothing to measure against, nor are they making any effort to meet any sort of flying standard, so other than landing… there’s nothing familiar about pattern.   There will never be a big audience.    Our target has to be the group of people that want to become better precision pilots (they do exist) and make them aware that Pattern is the way to get there.


MARK ATWOOD
o.  (440) 229-2502
c.  (216) 316-2489
e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com<mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>

Paragon Consulting, Inc.
5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>

<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
Powering The Digital Experience

On Sep 19, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Stuart Chale via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:

And more importantly a lot of people play it and realize how good those guys (and gals) really are.
Just a quick Google of number of people that played golf in the US per year.  Not sure of the accuracy but between 25 and 29 million.
That's only about 25 to 29 million more than there are pattern fliers.  Taking rounding errors into account of course :)

Stuart

On 9/19/2016 4:22 PM, John Pavlick via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
That’s because there’s lots of $$$ involved in Pro Golf.

John Pavlick
Cell: 203-417-4971

<ATT00001.png>
Integrated Development Services


From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Vogel, Peter via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 3:54 PM
To: John Fuqua; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Competition

That's an excellent point.  Pro golf is *incredibly* boring to watch, yet it's on TV *a lot*.
________________________________
From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of John Fuqua via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 12:51:38 PM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Competition

I like to compare it to pro golf.   Unless you have played you have no idea of the difficulty.

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of W Anthony Abdullah via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 2:21 PM
To: Peter Vogel; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Competition

That I would agree with. It's like watching a plane fly a simple loop, vs. watching the same loop with an explanation of downgrades like, wings not level, entry and exit altitude changes, and overall roundness. It's that understanding that increases the respect and interest in said maneuver.

That fact notwithstanding, pattern still is not a big spectator sport. It just takes a special sort of person to appreciate it. Most people have the same response my nephew has... Whatever...

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 19, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Peter Vogel via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
>However, in terms of spectator interest, I would say our patterns are analogous to the compulsories in figure skating.
>  I have thought about that before.  Other than the skater falling over, I would have no idea how to judge skating.  Same > for most folks watching us fly.

Having watched televised compulsories back in the 80's, the key is the commentary.  Helping people to understand what they are watching for and to build a mental "relationship" with the competitors so they feel the same highs and lows as the competitor does during the flight.

That's why I think we need to do a Demo video of a world class competition, with expert commentary and color commentary from someone familiar with (but not necessarily at the world class judging level).  Then market that demo with ESPN, etc. and get it out there virally on YouTube.

At our annual airshow we do a live demo of precision aerobatics with me doing the commentary around the maneuvers to be flown -- it's one of the most popular demos (right next to turbines) and gets great feedback from an audience of over 1000.

Peter+

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Phil via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
Not the "Compulsories", Ed...

They do figures that are required, and are judged on a 10-point scale.

However, in terms of spectator interest, I would say our patterns are analogous to the compulsories in figure skating.  I have thought about that before.  Other than the skater falling over, I would have no idea how to judge skating.  Same for most folks watching us fly.

Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus
AMA 1294, Scientific Leader Member
SPA L-18, Board Member
Oliver Springs, TN  (865) 435-1476v  (865) 604-0541c

________________________________
I was speaking in terms of how exciting it is to watch, not the "performance" itself.  Figure skating is closer to IMAC freestyle.

On Sep 19, 2016, at 10:28 AM, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com<mailto:vogel.peter at gmail.com>> wrote:

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



--
Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
Associate Vice President, Academy of Model Aeronautics District X
Treasurer, National Society of Radio Control Aerobatics (NSRCA)
<ATT00002.jpg><ATT00003.jpg>
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160919/f5fa403d/attachment.html>