[NSRCA-discussion] Registration - Pro-Active

[Patternpilot One]

First you have to have club leadership give a shit and follow even the basic ama safety code.



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Keith Hoard via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: 12/23/2015 12:28 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Registration - Pro-Active

I don't think that is a good idea at all.  It may work in the movies, but in
actual practice inviting the FAA to your home turf is like inviting the
police into your own home.  There is no upside to it at all.  Goodwill today
will in no way prevent an enforcement action in the future.  In fact, it may
give them reason to start digging.

Let the AMA and your club leadership handle "educating" and "outreach" to
them.  The FAA is not your friend.

--Keith Hoard
--klhoard at outlook.com

|-----Original Message-----
|From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
|Behalf Of James Hiller via NSRCA-discussion
|Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 12:07
|To: 'John FORD' <astropattern at yahoo.com>; NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-
|discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
|Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Registration - Pro-Active
|
|My thought was, we'd be better off getting in front of this and
establishing a
|working relationship with those tasked with enforcement.
|
|Early this morning on CNN there was a news release showing a drone narrowly
|missing skier. The quad copter crashed right behind him. This was what we
|would refer to as a commercial operator getting video for the media.
|
|If the operator doesn't come forward; are the investigators aware that they
|aren't to find the operator at a model flying sight maybe 20+ miles away.
|
|I think we not only can help but should.
|
|Jim
|
|-----Original Message-----
|From: John FORD [mailto:astropattern at yahoo.com]
|Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:15 PM
|To: General pattern discussion; James Hiller
|Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Registration - Pro-Active
|
|I agree about education.
|In the event that FAA or local law enforcement shows up at the field, (and
after
|they have seen everybody's registration), there may be an opportunity to
|explain the concept of the club's over flight boundaries, separation of
heli and
|fixed wing zones, and the additional concept of the pattern box.
|
|Eventually, we can create an image of self-imposed OCD of boundaries,
zones,
|and boxes...
|
|They will eventually stop wasting their time with us.
|
|J
|
|
|
|On Dec 22, 2015 12:41 PM, James Hiller via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-
|discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
|>
|> Scott, I almost responded to your previous post on the NSRCA list on the
|16th about putting together a paper pointing out the facts, got me thinking
|about how to deal with registration going forward.
|>
|> Registration isn't going away and there is no substitute for knowledge.
|>
|> There are many knowledgeable and concerned individuals monitoring this
|list, so I'll put this out for serious discussion, if that's possible here.
|>
|> Responsibility for a compatible environment goes beyond AMA / FAA
|negations.
|>
|> WE, the modeling community need to be Pro-Active.
|>
|> We have an understanding of the equipment we use and its evolution and we
|are everywhere.
|>
|> The responsibility for educating first responders and the general public
falls
|on US. We probably need more than an educational document focused on the
|registration rule that can be used to inform first responders, mainly
firefighters
|and frontline police officers.
|>
|> They will be the first people to deal with an incident involving injury,
property
|damage, complaints and or violation of the national airspace.
|>
|> I believe we local modelers need to develop a working relationship with
first
|responders in an instructional capacity by offering an informative and on
sight
|presentation highlighting the equipment, capabilities, differences and how
to
|safely deal with it.
|>
|> I don't know how much of this information they already have or how up to
|date it is but I believe our participation would be appreciated.
|>
|> The AMA should oversee the development of presentation material and
|instructor guidelines in an effort to maintain national continuity. A power
point
|presentation by involved users is likely to be more effective than just
sending a
|document without an opportunity for discussion.
|>
|> The downside is keeping up with RPV development and their capabilities
and
|the need for ongoing informative seminars.
|>
|> Hopefully first responders with prior knowledge would help direct
|investigation beyond a visit to approved model flying sights.
|>
|> Jim Hiller
|
|_______________________________________________
|NSRCA-discussion mailing list
|NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
|http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20151223/d7009fb4/attachment.html>