[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed 2015 sequences

wayg2013 at gmail.com wayg2013 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 28 07:28:49 AKDT 2014


Whining not allowed.
hmmm like three rolls in a row in intermediate wasn’t fun... or the reverse avalanche that everyone though would be a wing buster.

From: Jarvis Johnson via NSRCA-discussion 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 8:34 AM
To: james woodward ; General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed 2015 sequences

People people, stop your crying, there is nothing wrong with the 2015 proposed sequences.We want it to easy,it time to step it up, so go out there and fly !!!!!!!!



On Monday, July 28, 2014 6:21 AM, james woodward via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:




Did anyone see the 2014 Nats F3A Finals Unknowns?  Insanity!!  LOL.    
Jim



On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Del R via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

  While I do not dispute your thoughts and writing Mark do you accept and realize that this also drives the casual and medium dollar pilot backwards or away?  As long as you accept that is part of what drives people away from being able to compete then you are also a realist. 

      Del 
          x nsrca 473 
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion 
    To: NSRCA General 
    Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2014 9:11 PM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed 2015 sequences

    Integrated rolling maneuvers were only introduced to FAI in the last 10 years.  Over that time Masters has stayed fairly stagnant with regard to any type of new maneuver or difficulty.  I was flying masters when they introduced 2 rolls in opposite directions and we all had a similar thought… “I have to roll the OTHER way???  This isn’t FAI….”   We adjusted.  

    The gap between Masters and FAI is growing rapidly.  If we want Masters to prepare pilots for FAI than we need to keep the gap reasonable.  Yes, Masters is a destination for some.  So is Advanced…heck, so is Intermediate.  But that doesn’t change their primary purpose of being stepping stones to improve our flying, culminating with FAI. 


    Mark Atwood                                                                     
    Paragon Consulting, Inc.  |  President                                 
    5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124                        
    Direct: 440.229.2502 |  Fax: 440.684.3102               
    www.paragon-inc.com                                                                            
                                                                                                                  

           


    On Jul 27, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:


    Several masters pilots at the NATS indicated they would return to advanced because of the roller...It was indicated that who cares how easy it might be masters is not FAI .. 

    An hour glass in advanced seemed a bit much for that class imo..
    Sent from my iPhone


      On Jul 27, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

      We would be asking for final BOD approval in Oct.

      Dale


        On Jul 27, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Chuck Hochhalter via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

        When will these be approved?

        Chuck

        Sent from my iPhone
        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140728/cf5972a8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140728/cf5972a8/attachment.png>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list