[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed 2015 sequences

[Derek Koopowitz]

+1


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Wayne Galligan via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

>   Whining not allowed.
> hmmm like three rolls in a row in intermediate wasn’t fun... or the
> reverse avalanche that everyone though would be a wing buster.
>
>  *From:* Jarvis Johnson via NSRCA-discussion
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 28, 2014 8:34 AM
> *To:* james woodward <jimwoodward89 at gmail.com> ; General pattern
> discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed 2015 sequences
>
>  People people, stop your crying, there is nothing wrong with the 2015
> proposed sequences.We want it to easy,it time to step it up, so go out
> there and fly !!!!!!!!
>
>
>   On Monday, July 28, 2014 6:21 AM, james woodward via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>
>   Did anyone see the 2014 Nats F3A Finals Unknowns?  Insanity!!  LOL.
> Jim
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Del R via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>   While I do not dispute your thoughts and writing Mark do you accept and
> realize that this also drives the casual and medium dollar pilot backwards
> or away?  As long as you accept that is part of what drives people away
> from being able to compete then you are also a realist.
>
>     Del
>         x nsrca 473
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *To:* NSRCA General <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 27, 2014 9:11 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed 2015 sequences
>
>  Integrated rolling maneuvers were only introduced to FAI in the last 10
> years.  Over that time Masters has stayed fairly stagnant with regard to
> any type of new maneuver or difficulty.  I was flying masters when they
> introduced 2 rolls in opposite directions and we all had a similar thought…
> “I have to roll the OTHER way???  This isn’t FAI….”   We adjusted.
>
> The gap between Masters and FAI is growing rapidly.  If we want Masters to
> prepare pilots for FAI than we need to keep the gap reasonable.  Yes,
> Masters is a destination for some.  So is Advanced…heck, so is
> Intermediate.  But that doesn’t change their primary purpose of being
> stepping stones to improve our flying, culminating with FAI.
>
>
> Mark
> Atwood
> Paragon Consulting, Inc.  |  President
> 5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio,
> 44124
> Direct: 440.229.2502 |  Fax: 440.684.3102
> www.paragon-inc.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>
> Several masters pilots at the NATS indicated they would return to advanced
> because of the roller...It was indicated that who cares how easy it might
> be masters is not FAI ..
>
> An hour glass in advanced seemed a bit much for that class imo..
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 27, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> We would be asking for final BOD approval in Oct.
>
> Dale
>
> On Jul 27, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Chuck Hochhalter via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> When will these be approved?
>
> Chuck
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>  ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140728/868f0403/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140728/868f0403/attachment.png>