[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed 2015 sequences
Del R
drykert2 at rochester.rr.com
Mon Jul 28 05:05:28 AKDT 2014
While I do not dispute your thoughts and writing Mark do you accept and realize that this also drives the casual and medium dollar pilot backwards or away? As long as you accept that is part of what drives people away from being able to compete then you are also a realist.
Del
x nsrca 473
----- Original Message -----
From: Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion
To: NSRCA General
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2014 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed 2015 sequences
Integrated rolling maneuvers were only introduced to FAI in the last 10 years. Over that time Masters has stayed fairly stagnant with regard to any type of new maneuver or difficulty. I was flying masters when they introduced 2 rolls in opposite directions and we all had a similar thought… “I have to roll the OTHER way??? This isn’t FAI….” We adjusted.
The gap between Masters and FAI is growing rapidly. If we want Masters to prepare pilots for FAI than we need to keep the gap reasonable. Yes, Masters is a destination for some. So is Advanced…heck, so is Intermediate. But that doesn’t change their primary purpose of being stepping stones to improve our flying, culminating with FAI.
Mark Atwood
Paragon Consulting, Inc. | President
5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
Direct: 440.229.2502 | Fax: 440.684.3102
www.paragon-inc.com
On Jul 27, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
Several masters pilots at the NATS indicated they would return to advanced because of the roller...It was indicated that who cares how easy it might be masters is not FAI ..
An hour glass in advanced seemed a bit much for that class imo..
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
We would be asking for final BOD approval in Oct.
Dale
On Jul 27, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Chuck Hochhalter via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
When will these be approved?
Chuck
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140728/37117d45/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140728/37117d45/attachment.png>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list