[NSRCA-discussion] flutter again

[George Kennie]

That might be worth a try Michael, thanks


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Michael Ramsey <milehipilot at gmail.com>wrote:

> Is the wing flat? Maybe some turbulators would help?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 13, 2013, at 5:10 PM, George Kennie <geobet4evr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I build in stiffeners into the surfaces in both the balance tab and
> longitudinally so I don't think there's a flex problem.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Michael Ramsey <milehipilot at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Probably 5.0V.
>>
>> I'm sure that you've seen what the bottom of the aileron looks like on an
>> F3P model. Would an external frame of carbon fiber help your design here?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:56 PM, George Kennie <geobet4evr at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> They're running on the BEC voltage. The ailerons are individually
>>> powered.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Michael Ramsey <milehipilot at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> But they are aircraft servos right? What voltage are they running on?
>>>>
>>>> Paddles are normally used to reduce stick loads on ailerons that are
>>>> linked to a single servo (or control stick). I don't believe dual servo
>>>> setups benefit from aileron paddles.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:49 PM, George Kennie <geobet4evr at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd be surprised Michael. These are Solar servos and I think they're
>>>>> either one or two micro/sec and there is no slop anywhere
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Michael Ramsey <milehipilot at gmail.com
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Could what you're experiencing have anything to do with the deadband
>>>>>> specification of the servo?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:34 PM, George Kennie <geobet4evr at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The plane with the tape hinges was modified with balance tabs that I
>>>>>>> made up at the exact weight of the total surface and added an additional
>>>>>>> sub small surface at a different incidence and nothing changed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Tom Simes <simestd at netexpress.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09/13/13 13:27, George Kennie wrote:
>>>>>>>> > It's an original foamy design with 3D size surfaces, Michael.
>>>>>>>> > It's a progression of my Rad-Tad series
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have you considered taping on some quickie aerodynamic balancing
>>>>>>>> tabs to
>>>>>>>> see if the behavior changes?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>>>>>    "Z80 system stack overflow.  Shut 'er down Scotty, she's
>>>>>>>>          sucking mud again!" - Error message on XENIX v3.0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tom Simes
>>>>>>>> simestd at netexpress.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130914/de5f2284/attachment.html>