[NSRCA-discussion] flutter again
George Kennie
geobet4evr at gmail.com
Fri Sep 13 13:56:12 AKDT 2013
They're running on the BEC voltage. The ailerons are individually powered.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Michael Ramsey <milehipilot at gmail.com>wrote:
> But they are aircraft servos right? What voltage are they running on?
>
> Paddles are normally used to reduce stick loads on ailerons that are
> linked to a single servo (or control stick). I don't believe dual servo
> setups benefit from aileron paddles.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:49 PM, George Kennie <geobet4evr at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I'd be surprised Michael. These are Solar servos and I think they're
>> either one or two micro/sec and there is no slop anywhere
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Michael Ramsey <milehipilot at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Could what you're experiencing have anything to do with the deadband
>>> specification of the servo?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:34 PM, George Kennie <geobet4evr at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The plane with the tape hinges was modified with balance tabs that I
>>>> made up at the exact weight of the total surface and added an additional
>>>> sub small surface at a different incidence and nothing changed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Tom Simes <simestd at netexpress.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 09/13/13 13:27, George Kennie wrote:
>>>>> > It's an original foamy design with 3D size surfaces, Michael.
>>>>> > It's a progression of my Rad-Tad series
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you considered taping on some quickie aerodynamic balancing tabs
>>>>> to
>>>>> see if the behavior changes?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>> "Z80 system stack overflow. Shut 'er down Scotty, she's
>>>>> sucking mud again!" - Error message on XENIX v3.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom Simes simestd at netexpress.com
>>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130913/cdc58f96/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list