[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

Ed Alt ed_alt at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 24 08:27:53 AKST 2013


Well, I guess we really gave  Ken some great test feedback.  Looks like the forum is still working normally!

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:57 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:

> I think we were up to 0, then A, then B . . .
>  
> From: Peter Vogel
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:54 AM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> No, 0AB hex is the bit pattern:  010101011 which is octal 2(010)5(101)3(011)
> 
> Sent from my iPhone5
> 
> On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:51 AM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com> wrote:
> 
>> Well, after 0AB hex, octal would be 15/16/17 (or 567)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->Robert Beaubien
>> 
>> <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->D7 Webmaster
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:47 AM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Cc: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Can you please express that in octal?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Larry Diamond
>> 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM
>> 
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
>> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> There is always one… lol 789
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41      AM
>> To: 'General pattern discussion'
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 456
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Ken Velez
>> 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM
>> 
>> To: 'General pattern discussion'
>> 
>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 123
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/dee57253/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list