[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

[Keith Hoard]

What would you call “normal”?

From: Ed Alt 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:05 AM
To: General pattern discussion 
Cc: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

Well, I guess we really gave  Ken some great test feedback.  Looks like the forum is still working normally!

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:57 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:


  I think we were up to 0, then A, then B . . . 

  From: Peter Vogel 
  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:54 AM
  To: General pattern discussion 
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

  No, 0AB hex is the bit pattern:  010101011 which is octal 2(010)5(101)3(011)

  Sent from my iPhone5

  On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:51 AM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com> wrote:


    Well, after 0AB hex, octal would be 15/16/17 (or 567)

     

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->Robert Beaubien

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->D7 Webmaster

     

    "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."

     

    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
    Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:47 AM
    To: General pattern discussion
    Cc: General pattern discussion
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

     

    Can you please express that in octal?



    Sent from my iPhone


    On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:

      Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )

       

      From: Larry Diamond 

      Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM

      To: General pattern discussion 

      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

       

      OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!

       

      From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
      To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
      Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

       

      There is always one… lol 789

       

      From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
      Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
      To: 'General pattern discussion'
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

       

      456

       

      From: Ken Velez 

      Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM

      To: 'General pattern discussion' 

      Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

       

      123

      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/791c9078/attachment.html>