[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

[Keith Hoard]

I think we were up to 0, then A, then B . . . 

From: Peter Vogel 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:54 AM
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

No, 0AB hex is the bit pattern:  010101011 which is octal 2(010)5(101)3(011)

Sent from my iPhone5

On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:51 AM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com> wrote:


  Well, after 0AB hex, octal would be 15/16/17 (or 567)

   

  <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->Robert Beaubien

  <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->D7 Webmaster

   

  "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."

   

  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:47 AM
  To: General pattern discussion
  Cc: General pattern discussion
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

   

  Can you please express that in octal?



  Sent from my iPhone


  On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:

    Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )

     

    From: Larry Diamond 

    Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM

    To: General pattern discussion 

    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

     

    OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!

     

    From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
    To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
    Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

     

    There is always one… lol 789

     

    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
    Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
    To: 'General pattern discussion'
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

     

    456

     

    From: Ken Velez 

    Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM

    To: 'General pattern discussion' 

    Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

     

    123

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/1bda792b/attachment.html>