[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

[Robert L. Beaubien]

Note, I said “After”, but that is a different way of looking at it…  Was running the pattern a different way.

-          Robert Beaubien
-          Sr. Software Architect
-          Kool Software LLC

"No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Peter Vogel
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:54 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

No, 0AB hex is the bit pattern:  010101011 which is octal 2(010)5(101)3(011)

Sent from my iPhone5

On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:51 AM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com<mailto:rob at koolsoft.com>> wrote:
Well, after 0AB hex, octal would be 15/16/17 (or 567)

-          Robert Beaubien
-          D7 Webmaster

"No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:47 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Cc: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

Can you please express that in octal?


Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com<mailto:klhoard at hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )

From: Larry Diamond<mailto:ldiamond at diamondrc.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM
To: General pattern discussion<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!

From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com<mailto:kvelez at rochester.rr.com>>
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

There is always one… lol 789

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

456

From: Ken Velez<mailto:kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

123
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
________________________________
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/6daa2c0f/attachment.html>