[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

[Peter Vogel]

No, 0AB hex is the bit pattern:  010101011 which is octal 2(010)5(101)3(011)

Sent from my iPhone5

On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:51 AM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com> wrote:

> Well, after 0AB hex, octal would be 15/16/17 (or 567)
>  
> -          Robert Beaubien
> -          D7 Webmaster
>  
> "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."
>  
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:47 AM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Cc: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> Can you please express that in octal?
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )
>  
> From: Larry Diamond
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!
>  
> From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> There is always one… lol 789
>  
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> 456
>  
> From: Ken Velez
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> 123
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/5c68ffe1/attachment.html>