[NSRCA-discussion] Ballots

[Ronald Van Putte]

According to Miss Nancy, we need to vote on it so we can find out what is in it.  What part of that don't you understand?

Ron

On Nov 30, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Keith Hoard wrote:

> Is it too early for me to claim voter fraud?
>  
> Sent from Windows Mail
>  
> From: Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>
> Sent: ‎November‎ ‎30‎, ‎2012 ‎8‎:‎32‎ ‎AM
> To: Jim Quinn <jaqfly at prodigy.net>
> CC: NSRCA <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots
>  
> I do too, but don't they deserve to know their reasons why the board is proposing the changes?
> 
> 
> 
> Jim Quinn <jaqfly at prodigy.net> wrote:
> 
>  
> I trust our membership.
>  
> Jim Quinn
> 
> 
> From: "jonlowe at aol.com" <jonlowe at aol.com>
> To: Jim Quinn <jaqfly at prodigy.net>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri, November 30, 2012 8:10:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots
> 
> How do we have "informed discussion" if no rationale for the proposed changes has been provided?  Who wrote them? Can't they provide the rationale? Surely the board discussed them.
> 
> Jon
> 
> Jon
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Jim Quinn" <jaqfly at prodigy.net>
> Date: Fri, Nov 30, 2012 6:55 am
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots
> To: "jonlowe at aol.com" <jonlowe at aol.com>
> 
>  
> Hi Jon,
>  
> I tried to clean up the revisions when I sent them out.
> I'm looking forward to an informed discussion on the web when our members receive the revisions in the mail.
>  
> Jim Quinn
> 
> 
> From: "jonlowe at aol.com" <jonlowe at aol.com>
> To: Jim Quinn <jaqfly at prodigy.net>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Thu, November 29, 2012 7:35:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots
> 
> Jim,
> There were a lot of typos in the original bylaws revision in the meeting minutes, to include what I believe were wrong paragraph numbering in one case. Can you post the version we are being asked to vote on along with rationale for each change?
> 
> Job
> 
> Jon
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Jim Quinn" <jaqfly at prodigy.net>
> Date: Thu, Nov 29, 2012 7:10 pm
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> 
> I’ve just returned from the post office.
> All current members will receive two documents in the mail in the next few days.
>  
> A. The ballot for President.
> It is ¼ page so be sure to find it in the envelope.
> It is the ONLY valid ballot to vote for the new President.
>  
> I’ve requested their resumes be sent to our
> Discussion List
> Website and
> Face Book page.
>  
>  
> B. 2012 Revisions to By-Laws
> It is a full page.
> You can approve individual items
> Or
> You can approve the entire revision.
>  
> IF YOU KNOW SOMEONE WITHOUT WEB ACCESS
> PLEASE LET ME KNOW.
> I’LL SEND A PAPER COPY OF THE RESUMES TO HIM/HER.
>  
> Thank yo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20121201/652eafa1/attachment.html>