[NSRCA-discussion] Ballots

[Keith Hoard]

Jus' gimme my cell-fone. . .

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 30, 2012, at 18:05, Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com> wrote:

According to Miss Nancy, we need to vote on it so we can find out what is
in it.  What part of that don't you understand?

Ron

On Nov 30, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Keith Hoard wrote:

Is it too early for me to claim voter fraud?

Sent from Windows Mail

*From:* Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>
*Sent:* ‎November‎ ‎30‎, ‎2012 ‎8‎:‎32‎ ‎AM
*To:* Jim Quinn <jaqfly at prodigy.net>
*CC:* NSRCA <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
*Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots

I do too, but don't they deserve to know their reasons why the board is
proposing the changes?



Jim Quinn <jaqfly at prodigy.net> wrote:


I trust our membership.

Jim Quinn


------------------------------
*From:* "jonlowe at aol.com" <jonlowe at aol.com>
*To:* Jim Quinn <jaqfly at prodigy.net>; General pattern discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
*Sent:* Fri, November 30, 2012 8:10:04 AM
*Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots

How do we have "informed discussion" if no rationale for the proposed
changes has been provided?  Who wrote them? Can't they provide the
rationale? Surely the board discussed them.

Jon

Jon

----- Reply message -----
From: "Jim Quinn" <jaqfly at prodigy.net>
Date: Fri, Nov 30, 2012 6:55 am
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots
To: "jonlowe at aol.com" <jonlowe at aol.com>


Hi Jon,

I tried to clean up the revisions when I sent them out.
I'm looking forward to an informed discussion on the web when our members
receive the revisions in the mail.

Jim Quinn


------------------------------
*From:* "jonlowe at aol.com" <jonlowe at aol.com>
*To:* Jim Quinn <jaqfly at prodigy.net>; General pattern discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
*Sent:* Thu, November 29, 2012 7:35:39 PM
*Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots

Jim,
There were a lot of typos in the original bylaws revision in the meeting
minutes, to include what I believe were wrong paragraph numbering in one
case. Can you post the version we are being asked to vote on along with
rationale for each change?

Job

Jon

----- Reply message -----
From: "Jim Quinn" <jaqfly at prodigy.net>
Date: Thu, Nov 29, 2012 7:10 pm
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Ballots
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

I’ve just returned from the post office.
All current members will receive two documents in the mail in the next few
days.


*A. The ballot for President.*
It is ¼ page so be sure to find it in the envelope.
It is the *ONLY* valid ballot to vote for the new President.


I’ve requested their resumes be sent to our
Discussion List
Website and
Face Book page.




*B. 2012 Revisions to By-Laws*
It is a full page.
You can approve individual items
Or
You can approve the entire revision.


*IF YOU KNOW SOMEONE WITHOUT WEB ACCESS*
*PLEASE LET ME KNOW.*
*I’LL SEND A **PAP**ER **COPY** OF THE RESUMES TO HIM/HER.*


Thank yo

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20121201/c1522c32/attachment.html>