[NSRCA-discussion] DriveWear Glasses

astropuppy astropuppy at gmail.com
Tue Feb 7 08:08:56 AKST 2012


Thanks, I had never thought of polarization in a head tilting way; it makes
total sense. Thank you for the explanation.

As a Sidebar I do remember when polarized sunglasses first came on the
market. They where all the rage. Guess until now I assumed them to be
better.

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've tried flying with polarized.  If you don't consider the LCD portion
> and just look at the flying portion, it's fine....if you don't move your
> head (aka tilt).  If you maintain a perfectly straight head, it's not bad
> but let me just say that I don't know a single person that doesn't tilt
> their head when flying.  When you tilt, it changes the polarization "look"
> and the sky totally changes.  Try this just looking up at the sky and
> tilting your head side to side.  You'll see the difference.  Any of these
> companies you decide to go with can get you non-polarized lenses but
> sometimes you have to specify.
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Bob Richards <bob at toprudder.com> wrote:
>
>> I tried - and rejected - using polarized lenses for flying pattern. I
>> thought it would be a good idea, but ended up not liking it. Can't really
>> explain why, just remember not liking it.
>>
>> Bob R.
>>
>>
>> --- On *Tue, 2/7/12, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com>* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] DriveWear Glasses
>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2012, 10:21 AM
>>
>>
>> I bought a pair of Oakley prescription glasses.  For our purposes (model
>> aviation), I was told NOT to get the polarized version.  Mine are amazing
>> and worth the money paid.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vogel.peter@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>  Polarized lenses often make it difficult, if not impossible, to read
>> the LCD display on our radios because the direction of polarization in
>> glasses is 90 degrees opposite the polarization of the LCD film.
>>
>> Peter+
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone4S
>>
>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:45 AM, astropuppy <astropuppy at gmail.com<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=astropuppy@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Does anybody have experience wearing DriveWear lens while flying?
>>
>> http://www.drivewearlens.com/home.php?flashchange=8
>>
>> I am going to be buying new prescription glasses soon and would like to
>> consider all possibilities.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Scott A. McHarg*
>>
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Scott A. McHarg*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120207/d7fc8037/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list