[NSRCA-discussion] DriveWear Glasses

[Bob Richards]

I tried - and rejected - using polarized lenses for flying pattern. I thought it would be a good idea, but ended up not liking it. Can't really explain why, just remember not liking it.
 
Bob R.


--- On Tue, 2/7/12, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com> wrote:


From: Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] DriveWear Glasses
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2012, 10:21 AM


I bought a pair of Oakley prescription glasses.  For our purposes (model aviation), I was told NOT to get the polarized version.  Mine are amazing and worth the money paid.

Scott


On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com> wrote:



Polarized lenses often make it difficult, if not impossible, to read the LCD display on our radios because the direction of polarization in glasses is 90 degrees opposite the polarization of the LCD film. 


Peter+

Sent from my iPhone4S



On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:45 AM, astropuppy <astropuppy at gmail.com> wrote:




Does anybody have experience wearing DriveWear lens while flying?


http://www.drivewearlens.com/home.php?flashchange=8 


I am going to be buying new prescription glasses soon and would like to consider all possibilities.


Mike

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



-- 
Scott A. McHarg


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120207/a46ce0ca/attachment.html>