[NSRCA-discussion] DriveWear Glasses
Scott McHarg
scmcharg at gmail.com
Tue Feb 7 06:58:33 AKST 2012
Of course, right when I sent that, I remember the other name that I was
considering. I'm sorry I left the original question that Mike asked about
DriveWear. The other pair was from Wiley-X. The link to their site is
http://www.wileyx.com/index.aspx
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Honestly, I haven't tried them much in overcast conditions. I LOVE them
> in bright conditions. I have a feeling though that I will want to buy a
> pair of the black iridium lenses eventually. At the NATS, I had a pair of
> non-polarized grey lenses over my glasses during the overcast flights and I
> could really see my wings level much better. This was before the Oakleys
> so I'll have to do some experimentation. So far, it was worth the $400 I
> paid. The website shows they start at $150 but by the time you're done, it
> is quite a bit more expensive. My eye doctor had other choices that I was
> considering but cannot think of the name of them right now. If I find
> them, I'll send that link as well. They were considerably less expensive
> than the Oakleys and still looked studly.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:42 AM, astropuppy <astropuppy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> How do you like the Fire Iridium tint in overcast and bright conditions.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I bought these: http://www.oakley.com/products/4658/15247 with the Fire
>>> Iridium lens. There's a million styles out there for Oakley if you really
>>> like Oakley. These just fit my big ole head good.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Doug Cronkhite <seefo at san.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which frame/lens style did you get Scott?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I bought a pair of Oakley prescription glasses. For our purposes
>>>> (model aviation), I was told NOT to get the polarized version. Mine are
>>>> amazing and worth the money paid.
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Polarized lenses often make it difficult, if not impossible, to read
>>>>> the LCD display on our radios because the direction of polarization in
>>>>> glasses is 90 degrees opposite the polarization of the LCD film.
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter+
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4S
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:45 AM, astropuppy <astropuppy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anybody have experience wearing DriveWear lens while flying?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.drivewearlens.com/home.php?flashchange=8
>>>>>
>>>>> I am going to be buying new prescription glasses soon and would like
>>>>> to consider all possibilities.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Scott A. McHarg*
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Scott A. McHarg*
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Scott A. McHarg*
>
>
--
*Scott A. McHarg*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120207/9215a621/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list