[NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?

[Bob Pastorello]

Got it!  They are same C, same rating, same brand.
Thanks again.

On 12/10/12, Bill's Email <silentav8r at cox.net> wrote:
> Yes, just like when using two 5S packs in series you must use the same
> capacity and "C" rating.
>
>
> On 12/10/12 8:39 AM, J N Hiller wrote:
>>
>> Same capacity and C rating also???
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]*On Behalf Of
>> *atwooddon at aol.com
>> *Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2012 7:40 AM
>> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?
>>
>> Hey Bob
>>
>> There should be no difference in performance compared to 2 5S setup.
>> Obviously, charging is different due to unequal cell counts in packs,
>> but to the ESC, it looks like a 10S pack when you connect a 6S and a
>> 4S in series.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bob Pastorello <rpasto513 at gmail.com>
>> To: PatternList <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 7:18 am
>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?
>>
>> Wondering if anyone has run these instead of 10s, and were results
>> different from 2x 5S setups?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>