[NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?
Atwood, Mark
atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
Mon Dec 10 10:29:16 AKST 2012
I think this would be my biggest concern, that while the packs might be labeled the same (same MAH and C rating) that the interncal cells might actually vary more between 4s and 6s configurations than they would with identical 5s pack. Different production runs, etc.
Theoretically though there should be no difference.
Mark Atwood
Paragon Consulting, Inc. | President
5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
Phone: 440.684.3101 x102 | Fax: 440.684.3102
mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com<mailto:mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com> | www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
On Dec 10, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Bill's Email wrote:
Yes, just like when using two 5S packs in series you must use the same capacity and "C" rating.
On 12/10/12 8:39 AM, J N Hiller wrote:
Same capacity and C rating also???
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of atwooddon at aol.com<mailto:atwooddon at aol.com>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 7:40 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?
Hey Bob
There should be no difference in performance compared to 2 5S setup. Obviously, charging is different due to unequal cell counts in packs, but to the ESC, it looks like a 10S pack when you connect a 6S and a 4S in series.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Pastorello <rpasto513 at gmail.com><mailto:rpasto513 at gmail.com>
To: PatternList <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 7:18 am
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?
Wondering if anyone has run these instead of 10s, and were results different from 2x 5S setups?
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list