[NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?

[Bill's Email]

Yes, just like when using two 5S packs in series you must use the same 
capacity and "C" rating.


On 12/10/12 8:39 AM, J N Hiller wrote:
>
> Same capacity and C rating also???
>
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]*On Behalf Of 
> *atwooddon at aol.com
> *Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2012 7:40 AM
> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?
>
> Hey Bob
>
> There should be no difference in performance compared to 2 5S setup. 
> Obviously, charging is different due to unequal cell counts in packs, 
> but to the ESC, it looks like a 10S pack when you connect a 6S and a 
> 4S in series.
>
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Pastorello <rpasto513 at gmail.com>
> To: PatternList <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 7:18 am
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 6S+4S-Good or Bad?
>
> Wondering if anyone has run these instead of 10s, and were results 
> different from 2x 5S setups?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20121210/77bf5137/attachment.html>