[NSRCA-discussion] Zero reference line on the Brio
Anthony Romano
anthonyr105 at hotmail.com
Sun Jan 2 05:55:34 AKST 2011
Took my Brio out of moth balls this year and converted it to E-power. After alot of playing with set up and discussions with Brian wound up with the cg just under 7" from the LE and the wing at almost +.75° to a 0 stab. No mix and best flying plane I have ever owned.
Anthony
From: AtwoodDon at aol.com
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:59:26 -0500
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Zero reference line on the Brio
I went back and looked at my notes and the original instructions state the tail should be 1" above the work bench, not 3/4". the directions also say to set the wing 1/4 degree positive and the stab 1/4 degree negative.
Don
In a message dated 1/1/2011 3:51:11 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, AtwoodDon at aol.com writes:
I believe with the belly resting on a level work surface, the bottom of the fuselage at the back/bottom of the fin is supposed to be 3/4" above the table. The fuse would then be at 'zero'.
Don
In a message dated 1/1/2011 7:14:43 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, precisionaero at hotmail.com writes:
Happy New Year everyone. Anyone know what the 0-0 reference line is on the Brio? It's winter maintenance time and I am verifying current stab, wing, and thrust incidences on my planes!
Mike Cohen
D4
=
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110102/69339654/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list