[NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .

[rcmaster199 at aol.com]

I ammended the list and it was up to date as of 2010...

But it was not done in 2011. I am no longer involved in Judging management so it is likely no one will carry that torch

Regards,
MattK



-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Mon, Dec 12, 2011 12:52 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .



I'll say, and I'm even in the report !!!!


I will have to amend my remark to read "no one has been willing (at least since 2007) . . . . ."


 
Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com


From: "rcmaster199 at aol.com" <rcmaster199 at aol.com>
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .


Geez,
 
Goes to show you that even long timers in the sport don't pay much attention...
 
There indeed is a statistical analysis method we applied for several years to score Judging performances. It obviously fell on deaf ears and blind eyes so we stopped. 
 
Matt Kebabjian


>
 *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .

 Actually, no.
 But,
 at least up until now, no one has been willing to propose using
 any statisical analysis on the judges performance.
 .
 Bob Kane
 getterflash at yahoo.com
 


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




_______________________________________________
SRCA-discussion mailing list
SRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
ttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20111214/01187fb0/attachment.html>