[NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .

[Bob Kane]

I'll say, and I'm even in the report !!!!

I will have to amend my remark to read "no one has been willing (at least since 2007) . . . . ."

 
Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com


________________________________
 From: "rcmaster199 at aol.com" <rcmaster199 at aol.com>
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .
 

Geez,
 
Goes to show you that even long timers in the sport don't pay much attention...
 
There indeed is a statistical analysis method we applied for several years to score Judging performances. It obviously fell on deaf ears and blind eyes so we stopped. 
 
Matt Kebabjian

>
> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Judging . . . . . .
>
> Actually, no.
> But,
> at least up until now, no one has been willing to propose using
> any statisical analysis on the judges performance.
> .
> Bob Kane
> getterflash at yahoo.com >
 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20111212/14009437/attachment.html>